Skip to content

Add control? support to memory adapter #46

@ghost

Description

it can just be defined as !present? or some other - the main point is that it should be defined, so that the memory adapter's API matches the base adapter

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions