diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 69101c78..e31a9d52 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
   - [Is there a `dumps`, `write` or `encode` function?](#is-there-a-dumps-write-or-encode-function)
   - [How do TOML types map into Python types?](#how-do-toml-types-map-into-python-types)
 - [Performance](#performance)
-  - [Pure Python](#pure-python)
   - [Mypyc generated wheel](#mypyc-generated-wheel)
+  - [Pure Python](#pure-python)
 
 <!-- mdformat-toc end -->
 
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ tomllib.loads("['This parses fine with Python 3.6+']")
 - it's lil'
 - pure Python with zero dependencies
 - the fastest pure Python parser [\*](#pure-python):
-  18x as fast as [tomlkit](https://pypi.org/project/tomlkit/),
+  14x as fast as [tomlkit](https://pypi.org/project/tomlkit/),
   2.1x as fast as [toml](https://pypi.org/project/toml/)
 - outputs [basic data types](#how-do-toml-types-map-into-python-types) only
 - 100% spec compliant: passes all tests in
@@ -202,36 +202,32 @@ The core library does not include write capability, as most TOML use cases are r
 
 The `benchmark/` folder in this repository contains a performance benchmark for comparing the various Python TOML parsers.
 
-Below are the results for commit [0724e2a](https://github.com/hukkin/tomli/tree/0724e2ab1858da7f5e05a9bffdb24c33589d951c).
+Below are the results for commit [064e492](https://github.com/hukkin/tomli/tree/064e492919b2338def788753b8c981c9131334c0).
 
-### Pure Python<a name="pure-python"></a>
+### Mypyc generated wheel<a name="mypyc-generated-wheel"></a>
 
 ```console
 foo@bar:~/dev/tomli$ python --version
-Python 3.12.7
+Python 3.14.2
 foo@bar:~/dev/tomli$ pip freeze
-attrs==21.4.0
-click==8.1.7
-pytomlpp==1.0.13
-qtoml==0.3.1
-rtoml==0.11.0
+pytomlpp==1.1.0
+rtoml==0.13.0
 toml==0.10.2
 tomli @ file:///home/foo/dev/tomli
-tomlkit==0.13.2
+tomlkit==0.13.3
 foo@bar:~/dev/tomli$ python benchmark/run.py
 Parsing data.toml 5000 times:
 ------------------------------------------------------
     parser |  exec time | performance (more is better)
 -----------+------------+-----------------------------
-     rtoml |    0.647 s | baseline (100%)
-  pytomlpp |    0.891 s | 72.62%
-     tomli |     3.14 s | 20.56%
-      toml |     6.69 s | 9.67%
-     qtoml |     8.27 s | 7.82%
-   tomlkit |     56.1 s | 1.15%
+     rtoml |    0.328 s | baseline (100%)
+  pytomlpp |    0.365 s | 89.75%
+     tomli |    0.838 s | 39.12%
+      toml |     3.01 s | 10.90%
+   tomlkit |     20.7 s | 1.59%
 ```
 
-### Mypyc generated wheel<a name="mypyc-generated-wheel"></a>
+### Pure Python<a name="pure-python"></a>
 
 ```console
 foo@bar:~/dev/tomli$ python benchmark/run.py
@@ -239,10 +235,9 @@ Parsing data.toml 5000 times:
 ------------------------------------------------------
     parser |  exec time | performance (more is better)
 -----------+------------+-----------------------------
-     rtoml |    0.668 s | baseline (100%)
-  pytomlpp |    0.893 s | 74.81%
-     tomli |     1.96 s | 34.18%
-      toml |     6.64 s | 10.07%
-     qtoml |     8.26 s | 8.09%
-   tomlkit |     52.9 s | 1.26%
+     rtoml |    0.323 s | baseline (100%)
+  pytomlpp |    0.365 s | 88.40%
+     tomli |     1.44 s | 22.36%
+      toml |     3.03 s | 10.65%
+   tomlkit |     20.6 s | 1.57%
 ```
diff --git a/benchmark/requirements.txt b/benchmark/requirements.txt
index 24339856..2b613587 100644
--- a/benchmark/requirements.txt
+++ b/benchmark/requirements.txt
@@ -5,5 +5,4 @@
 pytomlpp
 toml
 tomlkit
-qtoml
 rtoml
diff --git a/benchmark/run.py b/benchmark/run.py
index 83a406d8..ee88fc5e 100644
--- a/benchmark/run.py
+++ b/benchmark/run.py
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 import timeit
 
 import pytomlpp
-import qtoml
 import rtoml
 import toml
 import tomlkit
@@ -22,7 +21,7 @@ def benchmark(
 ) -> float:
     placeholder = "Running..."
     print(f"{name:>{col_width[0]}} | {placeholder}", end="", flush=True)
-    time_taken = timeit.timeit(func, number=run_count)
+    time_taken = min(timeit.repeat(func, number=run_count, repeat=5))
     print("\b" * len(placeholder), end="")
     time_suffix = " s"
     print(f"{time_taken:{col_width[1]-len(time_suffix)}.3g}{time_suffix}", end="")
@@ -39,9 +38,6 @@ def run(run_count: int) -> None:
     data_path = Path(__file__).parent / "data.toml"
     test_data = data_path.read_bytes().decode()
 
-    # qtoml has a bug making it crash without this newline normalization
-    test_data = test_data.replace("\r\n", "\n")
-
     col_width = (10, 10, 28)
     col_head = ("parser", "exec time", "performance (more is better)")
     print(f"Parsing data.toml {run_count} times:")
@@ -55,7 +51,6 @@ def run(run_count: int) -> None:
     benchmark("pytomlpp", run_count, lambda: pytomlpp.loads(test_data), col_width, compare_to=baseline)  # noqa: E501
     benchmark("tomli", run_count, lambda: tomli.loads(test_data), col_width, compare_to=baseline)  # noqa: E501
     benchmark("toml", run_count, lambda: toml.loads(test_data), col_width, compare_to=baseline)  # noqa: E501
-    benchmark("qtoml", run_count, lambda: qtoml.loads(test_data), col_width, compare_to=baseline)  # noqa: E501
     benchmark("tomlkit", run_count, lambda: tomlkit.parse(test_data), col_width, compare_to=baseline)  # noqa: E501
     # fmt: on