Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
177 lines (147 loc) · 8.41 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

177 lines (147 loc) · 8.41 KB

metamodel

Enterprise Data Product Metamodel manamagement and the Data Product Life Cycle

Executive Summary

This project defines a comprehensive Enterprise Data Product metamodel strategy and illustrates how it interacts with the Enterprise Data Product Life Cycle. The metamodel provides a structured framework for conceptualizing, designing, implementing, and managing data products within an enterprise context, ensuring alignment with business objectives, governance requirements, and user needs throughout the product lifecycle.

Project Structure

metamodel/
├── .github/
│   └── workflows/
│       └── ci.yml
├── generated/
│   └── .gitkeep
├── metamodel_core/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── data/
│   │   └── metamodel.json      # <-- The core metamodel JSON file
│   ├── models/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   ├── metamodel.py
│   │   └── validators.py
│   ├── schema/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   └── protobuf_generator.py
├── scripts/
│   ├── generate_schema.py
│   └── validate_metamodel.py
├── tests/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── conftest.py
│   ├── test_models.py
│   ├── test_schema_generator.py
│   ├── test_validation.py
│   └── test_versioning.py
├── .gitignore
├── AUTHORIZED_INTEGRATORS.md
├── LICENSE
├── pyproject.toml
└── README.md

Here's a vendor-agnostic, technical process for managing the end-to-end lifecycle of an enterprise metamodel, including building, versioning, auditing, approving changes, and enforcing collection of metadata in alignment with the metamodel. This aligns with data engineering best practices and ensures enterprise governance.

⚙️ PART 1: Metamodel Lifecycle Management

1. Design and Build

Step Description
Authoring Format Use JSON to define the metamodel structure (e.g., entity types, attributes, constraints, validation rules).
Modular Design Decompose metamodel into reusable modules (e.g., core_entity_types, common_attributes, lineage, governance).
Schema Validation Define JSON Schema to validate metamodel definitions for structure and allowed values.
CI/CD Integration Treat metamodel as code in Git. Validate metamodel structure and integrity with pre-commit hooks or GitHub Actions.

2. Versioning

Step Description
SemVer Versioning Use Semantic Versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) to track metamodel changes.
Immutable Releases Store versions as immutable artifacts (e.g., Git tag, S3 object with versionId, or package in artifact registry).
Change Logs Auto-generate changelogs highlighting added/removed/modified fields using tools like json-diff.

3. Change Proposals and Review

Step Description
Change Proposal Process Use GitHub Pull Requests with a templated form describing:
  • Motivation
  • Impact to consumers
  • Backward compatibility
  • Validation strategy
Technical Review Board Approvals by a data architecture committee with representation from governance, engineering, and product.
Validation Suite Simulate impact on real metadata by running validation pipelines against a test corpus of data products.

4. Approval and Deployment

Step Description
Approval Artifacts Signed-off JSON/YAML record of approval metadata (who, when, justification).
Controlled Rollout Support environment-specific deployment (dev/staging/prod) via IaC or metadata management APIs.
Retirement Policies Mark old metamodel versions as deprecated with enforcement timelines and migration guides.

📏 PART 2: Enforcement and Data Collection Aligned with the Metamodel

1. Registration and Enforcement Framework

Step Description
Metadata Registry Implement a registry (e.g., via open-source catalog like Amundsen, DataHub, or internal API) that maps data products to required metadata fields per metamodel version.
Metadata Contracts Define machine-readable metadata contracts per data product type (dataset, API, model) derived from metamodel.
Enforcement Hooks Enforce contract adherence at:
  • CI/CD pipeline (dbt tests, ingestion jobs)
  • Data registration time (e.g., Airbyte/Fivetran sync)
  • Publishing time (e.g., Lake Formation registration or catalog sync)

2. Metadata Submission Workflows

Step Description
Interactive Forms / APIs Provide validated UIs (e.g., Streamlit) or APIs for metadata input when required fields change.
Slack/Email Notification Alert affected data product owners when new required attributes are added.
Staging and Validation Validate metadata submissions in a staging environment. Use JSON Schema validation and business rule engines (e.g., JQ, Great Expectations).

3. Audit and Monitoring

Step Description
Change Logs & Diffs Maintain metadata change history for each asset with links to the applied metamodel version.
Dashboards Track conformance KPIs: percentage of data products meeting latest metamodel, open violations, upcoming deadlines.
Policy Alerts Raise flags for missing metadata or late adoption of required fields via alerting systems (e.g., Data Observability tool or homegrown script).

🧩 Tooling Considerations (Vendor-Agnostic)

Category Options
Version Control GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket
Validation JSON Schema, Great Expectations, JQ
Packaging JSON/YAML + CI pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions)
Registry PostgreSQL/Neo4j or Open Metadata/Amundsen/DataHub
CI/CD for Metadata dbt tests, Airflow tasks, GitHub Actions
Notification Slack, PagerDuty, Email via webhooks
Audit Storage S3, Lakehouse table with Iceberg/Delta, ElasticSearch

✅ Example: New Attribute Enforcement Workflow

Scenario: A new required attribute data_sensitivity_level is added to the metamodel for all datasets.

  1. A PR is submitted to add data_sensitivity_level to the core_attributes module.
  2. CI runs validation: all test metadata records are scanned.
  3. PR is approved by the Data Architecture Committee and tagged as v2.1.0.
  4. Deployment pipeline marks v2.1.0 as "default" for dev environment.
  5. Slackbot notifies all data product owners with affected assets.
  6. UI/API is made available to submit data_sensitivity_level.
  7. Metadata registry enforces collection and rejects incomplete registrations.
  8. Audit logs track all metadata updates and show coverage over time.

PART 3: Visualization of Metamodel Lifecycle Management & Enforcement and Data Collection Aligned with the Metamodel

flowchart TD
  A[Author Metamodel: JSON] --> B[Validate Structure: JSON Schema]
  B --> C[Push to Git: Metamodel as Code]
  C --> D[Create PR with Change Proposal]
  D --> E[Run Validation Tests on Sample Metadata]
  E --> F[Review by Data Architecture Committee]
  F -->|Approved| G[Tag Release: SemVer]
  G --> H[Deploy to Metadata Registry]
  H --> I[Notify Stakeholders: Slack/Email]
  I --> J[Interactive Form/API for Metadata Collection]

  subgraph "Enforcement & Compliance"
    J --> K[Validate Metadata Submissions]
    K --> L[Reject Invalid or Incomplete Assets]
    K --> M[Log Valid Submissions with Version Info]
    M --> N[Audit & Track Conformance Dashboards]
  end

  L --> O[Notify Product Owners of Violations]
  G --> P[Retire Old Metamodel Versions]

  style A fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style B fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style C fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style D fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style E fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style F fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style G fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style H fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style I fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style J fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style K fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style L fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style M fill:#fdf6e3,stroke:#657b83
  style N fill:#eee8d5,stroke:#657b83
  style O fill:#dc322f,stroke:#657b83,color:#fff
  style P fill:#b58900,stroke:#657b83,color:#fff
Loading