[Question] Support for more SSGs

[VarLad]

Is there a documented way to add support for other SSGs?

[iakdis]

Hi there, thanks for the issue.
Sadly not yet, though something like this is planned. I'll add the enhancement label

[iakdis]

By the way, now that Jekyll is supported, I can start adding new SSGs from now on. Let me know, which ones you would be interested in.

[VarLad]

@iakmds It would be nice if you could add support for Franklin

Repo link here: https://github.com/tlienart/Franklin.jl

[VarLad]

@iakmds Any plans on this?
If not, do you have a guide which users can use to add SSGs themselves?

[iakdis]

I looked into it and it seems to be possible to implement.
What would you specifically like to see with BuhoCMS and Franklin? BuhoCMS could probably support these options:

• Create a site
• Create a file
• Start a server/Build a site (same process in Franklin?)

[VarLad]

@iakmds I think most of what Jekyll supports can be done by Franklin
So as such, is it feasible to implement all the same stuff as Jekyll?

[iakdis]

It depends on what you mean by most of what Jekyll supports. Because BuhoCMS currently supports 4 general actions for static site generators:

• Create a site
• Create a post
• Start a live server
• Build the website

Is that what you wish for, or are you talking about more specific features?

[VarLad]

@iakmds For now, that would be good!
Is it possible to make more feature requests for BuhoCMS + Franklin after the initial implementation is complete and has been merged?

[iakdis]

Hi, you could make feature requests, but don't expect them to be implemented very soon, as I'll try to focus on supporting more SSGs and fixing bugs. Once I've created a system for SSG specific features though, I will take a look at it!