Skip to content

Conversation

@iamfarhad
Copy link
Owner

  • Add explicit version 1.0.0 to composer.json
  • Update branch alias to dev-1.x pointing to 1.x-dev
  • Prepare for semantic versioning workflow

Pull Request

Description

Brief description of what this PR does.

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🎨 Code style/formatting changes
  • ♻️ Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • 🔒 Security fix
  • 🧪 Test improvements
  • 🔧 Build/CI changes

Related Issues

Fixes #(issue number)
Related to #(issue number)

Changes Made

  • Change 1
  • Change 2
  • Change 3

Testing

  • Unit tests pass
  • Integration tests pass
  • Manual testing completed
  • New tests added for new functionality

Test Coverage

  • All new code is covered by tests
  • No decrease in overall test coverage
  • Edge cases are tested

Performance Impact

  • No performance impact
  • Performance improvement
  • Performance regression (explain below)

Performance Notes:

Security Considerations

  • No security implications
  • Security improvement
  • Potential security impact (explain below)

Security Notes:

Breaking Changes

  • This PR introduces breaking changes

Breaking Change Details:

Documentation

  • Documentation updated
  • No documentation changes needed
  • Documentation update required (create issue)

Checklist

  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Screenshots/Examples

Additional Notes


For Reviewers

Review Focus Areas

  • Code quality and style
  • Test coverage and quality
  • Performance implications
  • Security considerations
  • Documentation accuracy
  • Breaking change impact

Security Review

  • No sensitive data exposed
  • Input validation appropriate
  • Authorization checks in place
  • Injection vulnerabilities checked

- Add explicit version 1.0.0 to composer.json
- Update branch alias to dev-1.x pointing to 1.x-dev
- Prepare for semantic versioning workflow
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @iamfarhad, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request establishes the initial setup for semantic versioning within the project. It introduces explicit version declaration and adjusts branch aliases to align with a structured release process, paving the way for future versioned releases.

Highlights

  • Explicit Versioning: The composer.json file now explicitly declares the package version as 1.0.0.
  • Branch Alias Update: The branch-alias configuration in composer.json has been updated from dev-main to dev-1.x, pointing to 1.x-dev.
  • Semantic Versioning Preparation: These changes are foundational steps to prepare the project for a semantic versioning workflow, ensuring consistent versioning practices.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@iamfarhad iamfarhad merged commit 47fe832 into main Sep 10, 2025
22 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to set up semantic versioning by adding an explicit version to composer.json and updating the branch alias. While the branch alias update is a good step towards a semantic versioning workflow, hardcoding the version in composer.json is discouraged for libraries published on Packagist. Versioning should be handled through Git tags to ensure consistency and avoid potential conflicts. My review includes a comment detailing this issue.

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "iamfarhad/laravel-prometheus",
"version": "1.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Hardcoding the version field in composer.json is not recommended for libraries that are published on Packagist. Packagist automatically determines the package version from your Git tags. Including the version here can lead to inconsistencies if a new release is tagged without updating this file, or vice-versa. The recommended practice is to omit this field and manage versions solely through Git tags.

To fix this, please remove this line. You will also need to remove the trailing comma from the "name" line above to ensure the JSON remains valid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants