Skip to content

The abnormal results of SRCNN? #2

@shigen97

Description

@shigen97

Thanks for you great work. I have a problem of the SRCNN model results. It seems that SRCNN performed poorly than bicubic method in all datasets. It may be somewhat strange that deep-learning-based method performed worse than interpolation. Could you provide any insight for this phenomenon?
I guess that SRCNN utilized the stride LR SM for input while bicubic do not?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions