You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ The "RateLimit-Policy" response header field is a non-empty List{{!RFC8941}} of
137
137
138
138
The field value SHOULD remain consistent over a sequence of HTTP responses. It is this characteristic that differentiates it from the [RateLimit](#ratelimit-field) field that contains information that MAY change on every request. The "RateLimit-Policy" field enables clients to control their own flow of requests based on policy information provided by the server. Situations where throttling constraints are highly dynamic are better served using the (RateLimit field)[{#ratelimit-field}] that communicates the latest service information a client can react to. Both fields can be communicated by the server when appropriate.
139
139
140
-
Lists of Quota Policy Items ({{quotapolicy-item}}) can be split over multiple "RateLimit-Policy" fields in the same HTTP response as described in {{section 3.1 of RFC8941}}.
140
+
Lists of Quota Policy Items ({{quotapolicy-item}}) can be split over multiple "RateLimit-Policy" fields in the same HTTP response as described in {{Section 3.1 of !STRUCTURED-FIELDS=RFC8941}}.
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ A server uses the "RateLimit" response header field to communicate the current s
223
223
224
224
The field is expressed as a List{{!RFC8941}} of Service Limit Items ({{servicelimit-item}}).
225
225
226
-
Lists of Service Limit Items can be split over multiple "RateLimit" fields in the same HTTP response as described in {{section 3.1 of RFC8941}}.
226
+
Lists of Service Limit Items can be split over multiple "RateLimit" fields in the same HTTP response as described in {{Section 3.1 of !STRUCTURED-FIELDS=RFC8941}}.
0 commit comments