fix spelling

Author: Mr-Leshiy

rust/rbac-registration/src/cardano/cip509/cip509.rs

@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ impl Cip509 {
     }
 
     /// Returns signing public key for a role.
-    /// Would return only signing public keys for the present ceritificates,
+    /// Would return only signing public keys for the present certificates,
     /// if certificate marked as deleted or undefined it would be skipped.
     #[must_use]
     pub(crate) fn signing_pk_for_role(

rust/rbac-registration/src/cardano/state.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-//! Cardano RBAC state traits, which are used during different statefull validation
+//! Cardano RBAC state traits, which are used during different stateful validation
 //! procedures.
 
 use std::future::Future;
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ pub trait RBACState {
         txn_id: &TransactionId,
     ) -> impl Future<Output = anyhow::Result<Option<CatalystId>>> + Send;
 
-    /// Update the update by "taking" the given `StakeAddress` for the correspoding RBAC
+    /// Update the update by "taking" the given `StakeAddress` for the corresponding RBAC
     /// chain's by the given `CatalystId`.
     fn take_stake_address_from_chain(
         &mut self,

rust/rbac-registration/src/registration/cardano/mod.rs

@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ impl RegistrationChainInner {
                 if cat_id == &self.catalyst_id {
                     cip509.report().functional_validation(
                         &format!(
-                            "Trying to apply the first registration to the assosiated {} again",
+                            "Trying to apply the first registration to the associated {} again",
                             cat_id.as_short_id()
                         ),
                         "It isn't allowed to submit first registration twice",
@@ -642,9 +642,9 @@ impl RegistrationChainInner {
         Some(new_inner)
     }
 
-    /// Update the registration chain with the `cip509` assosiated to another chain.
+    /// Update the registration chain with the `cip509` associated to another chain.
     /// This is the case when registration for different chain affecting the current one,
-    /// by invalidating some data for the current registration chain (stoling stake
+    /// by invalidating some data for the current registration chain (stealing stake
     /// addresses etc.).
     ///
     /// The provided `cip509` should be fully validated by another chain before trying to