Skip to content

Cip509Valid type #653

@Mr-Leshiy

Description

@Mr-Leshiy

Summary

Refine the current approach with Cip509 (and probably with some other types from rbac-registration) and distinguish a separate Cip509Valid type.
The main idea and desire, to not assume that some data is already processed and validated, make it as part of the type system.
Which would decrease the chance of making mistakes.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    squad: gatekeepersCatalyst App Backend, System Development & Integration Team

    Type

    Projects

    Status

    📋 Backlog

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions