Update leios-comparison.md

Author: kbennett2000

site/docs/leios-comparison.md

@@ -19,15 +19,6 @@ We scored each blockchain on a 0–10 scale, with higher scores indicating bette
 
 ## Scoring Criteria and Rationale
 
-### Scoring Criteria
-- **Throughput** - Transactions per second (TPS). 10 = 1,000+ TPS, 0 = ~1 TPS.
-- **Fee Predictability** - Fee consistency. 10 = fully deterministic, 0 = highly volatile.
-- **Fee Loss Protection** - Protection against fees for unprocessed transactions. 10 = no fees for failed/rejected Txs, 0 = frequent loss.
-- **Latency** - Time to final confirmation.
-- **Decentralization** - Validator/node count and governance. 10 = 1,000+ independent nodes, 0 = centralized.
-- **Security** - Attack resistance (e.g., 51% attack). 10 = proven secure, 0 = vulnerable.
-- **Scalability** - Growth without centralization. 10 = scales to 1,000+ TPS natively, 0 = no growth.
-
 ### Leios (Cardano)
 - **Throughput (8)** - Leios targets 100–1,000 TPS via parallel Input Blocks and pipelining, a massive leap from Praos’ 5–10 TPS. Simulations show 1,000 TPS is feasible, but it’s still in development, so not a perfect 10.
 - **Fee Predictability (8)** - Leios softens Cardano’s strict determinism with solutions like collateralization, where winning transactions may pay slightly higher fees (~1–2 ADA vs. 0.2 ADA). Fees stay mostly predictable, unlike volatile markets.