Skip to content

Commit 928cab0

Browse files
Update day-2-recap.md
1 parent d5fe703 commit 928cab0

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-4
lines changed

docs/workshop/day-2-recap.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ How much does it cost to run a Leios node at different TPS/ throughput levels?
3535

3636
The analysis reveals important characteristics about Leios's performance at different throughput levels:
3737

38-
- **Low TPS Overhead**: At low TPS (10 TPS), the protocol shows significant overhead compared to Praos, with resource usage increasing by 6x for compute and 1.8x for egress. This indicates a substantial baseline cost for running Leios at low throughput.
38+
- **Overhead**: At low TPS (10 TPS), the protocol shows significant overhead compared to Praos, with resource usage increasing by 6x for compute and 1.8x for egress. This indicates a substantial baseline cost for running Leios at low throughput.
3939

4040
- **Scaling Efficiency**: As TPS increases, Leios's relative overhead decreases. At 1K TPS, while absolute resource usage is higher, the protocol becomes more efficient relative to the throughput achieved.
4141

42-
- **Main Cost Driver**: The analysis identified that voting operations are the primary cost driver in the protocol. This finding sparked discussions about potential collaboration with Peras to reuse their voting mechanism, which could significantly reduce resource consumption and improve overall efficiency.
42+
- **Main Cost Driver**: At low throughput, the cost is mainly due to a static protocol overhead and dominated by voting operations. At higher throughput rates voting becomes a diminishing fraction of the overall egress cost and IB body transmission (node egress) becomes the main cost driver. This finding sparked discussions about potential collaboration with Peras to reuse their voting mechanism, which could significantly reduce resource consumption and improve overall efficiency.
4343

4444
- **Performance Characteristics**:
45-
- High end: Achieves high throughput with lower-than-Praos latency
45+
- High end: Achieves high throughput with possibly lower-than-Praos latency
4646
- Low end: Poor trade-off between latency and resource overheads
4747
- Currently experiencing longer settlement times (quantification pending)
4848

@@ -70,4 +70,3 @@ The analysis reveals important characteristics about Leios's performance at diff
7070
- add pricing to it
7171
- calculate possible revenue from tx fees
7272
- possibly build tool for it
73-
- incentives?

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)