[Question]: Do we need the `default` in the decorators?

[vedhav]

What is your question?

It is not easy to comprehend what they do, and the default behavior of them is not what I would expect.

1. The tm_g_distribution says that default decorators can be applied to all outputs but two objects are of ggplot2 class and other two are of listing_df class. Even in tm_a_pca where all the output objects are ggplot2 objects I would have to use if exists and the object name to apply the plot modification because each object is enclosed in its own qenv.
2. If I try to apply the the decorator as "default" it creates multiple UI for each of the output objects which is not the general intention for people who want to create a single decorator for all objects. Think of it as creating a decorator to change background color for all the plots. I don't want to have 4 color inputs, I just want one that is applied to all plots. If I wanted 4 color inputs, I can create 4 decorators. # of decorators = # of UI created.

So, I believe we should always allow the users to target the decoration to specific objects. If the decorator list is unnamed/default named, we will still create only one UI and server I see this is not possible because we need to target decoration to specific qenv object, so I propose we don't have it at all. What do you think @insightsengineering/nest-core-dev?

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct.

Contribution Guidelines

• I agree to follow this project's Contribution Guidelines.

Security Policy

• I agree to follow this project's Security Policy.

[vedhav]

We decided to remove the default from the decorators.