Remove ggmosaic

[llrs-roche]

Pull Request

Continuation of #933

Removing ggmosaic usage on main too.

I increased the version number too to avoid issues when loading the devel version being lower than the released one.

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                      Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
--------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------
R/tm_a_pca.R                    865     865  0.00%    141-1133
R/tm_a_regression.R             751     751  0.00%    180-1027
R/tm_data_table.R               201     201  0.00%    100-348
R/tm_file_viewer.R              172     172  0.00%    47-254
R/tm_front_page.R               143     132  7.69%    77-246
R/tm_g_association.R            320     320  0.00%    161-547
R/tm_g_bivariate.R              664     406  38.86%   332-786, 827, 932, 949, 967, 978-1000
R/tm_g_distribution.R          1106    1106  0.00%    156-1404
R/tm_g_response.R               345     345  0.00%    179-594
R/tm_g_scatterplot.R            709     709  0.00%    261-1065
R/tm_g_scatterplotmatrix.R      272     253  6.99%    200-501, 562, 576
R/tm_missing_data.R            1080    1080  0.00%    124-1380
R/tm_outliers.R                1026    1026  0.00%    162-1338
R/tm_t_crosstable.R             263     263  0.00%    177-482
R/tm_variable_browser.R         788     783  0.63%    89-1025, 1063-1246
R/utils.R                       185     120  35.14%   87-249, 278-304, 316-325, 330, 344-363, 452
R/zzz.R                           2       2  0.00%    2-3
TOTAL                          8892    8534  4.03%

Diff against main

Filename              Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------------  -------  ------  --------
R/tm_data_table.R        +1      +1  +100.00%
R/tm_g_bivariate.R       -6       0  -0.55%
TOTAL                    -5      +1  -0.07%

Results for commit: 6f74aa3

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   23 suites   24m 55s ⏱️
151 tests 140 ✅ 5 💤 0 ❌ 6 🔥
456 runs  445 ✅ 5 💤 0 ❌ 6 🔥

For more details on these errors, see this check.

Results for commit 6f74aa3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
shinytest2-tm_a_pca	💚	$156.94$	$-2.66$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_a_regression	💚	$71.23$	$-2.39$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_data_table	💚	$29.08$	$-1.12$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_g_bivariate	💚	$91.22$	$-1.45$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_g_distribution	💚	$69.85$	$-1.18$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_g_response	💚	$38.51$	$-1.31$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_g_scatterplot	💚	$86.38$	$-2.36$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_g_scatterplotmatrix	💚	$35.51$	$-1.75$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_misssing_data	💚	$63.29$	$-1.29$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_outliers	💚	$150.16$	$-3.55$	$0$	$0$	$0$	$0$
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$78.30$	$+541.52$	$-17$	$0$	$0$	$+6$

Additional test case details

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	Test Case
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$12.01$	$+91.29$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_Selecting_treat_variable_as_factor_changes_the_table_headers.
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$13.58$	$+89.74$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_changing_display_density_encoding_doesn_t_show_errors.
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$15.46$	$+87.83$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_changing_outlier_definition_encoding_doesn_t_show_errors.
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$16.63$	$+86.68$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_changing_plot_setting_encodings_doesn_t_show_errors.
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$10.63$	$+92.72$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_content_is_displayed_correctly.
shinytest2-tm_variable_browser	💔	$10.00$	$+93.27$	e2e_tm_variable_browser_selection_of_categorical_variable_has_a_table_with_level_header.

Results for commit 1d2ee1a

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[m7pr]

@llrs-roche suprisnigly there are 6 errors in CI
https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.modules.general/actions/runs/18836163482/job/53737543213?pr=940

[llrs-roche]

Yes I am surprised too as it works locally, on CRAN and on the CI for v0.5.1 branch release.
But tm_variable_browser() has some issues I'm tackling in a different PR