[Question]: Should decorators be also tested at the modules packages level?

[m7pr]

What is your question?

Currently there are 3 tests in teal and 2 shinytest2 tests in teal that cover decorators. Even though the main functionality is implemented in teal, actual usage and some customization is provided at modules packages. Should we extend modules packages tests (like in tmg/tmc) to cover decorators usage? Those module packages have some custom functions for decorators specification that do not exist in teal, hence the reason to test them there.

Some examples to be used for tmg:

• 1441 Introduce transformators parameter in modules teal.modules.general#826
• 1441 Introduce transformators parameter in modules teal.modules.general#826

[gogonzo]

Decorators should be tested in teal.modules.*. teal doesn't execute decorators as they are included through ui_args and server_args. teal can't guarantee if decorator returns correct object - it is impossible unless we introduce the design in which decorator would check itself (is it possible?)