You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
dmaengine: idxd: use spin_lock_irqsave before wait_event_lock_irq
In idxd_cmd_exec(), wait_event_lock_irq() explicitly calls
spin_unlock_irq()/spin_lock_irq(). If the interrupt is on before entering
wait_event_lock_irq(), it will become off status after
wait_event_lock_irq() is called. Later, wait_for_completion() may go to
sleep but irq is disabled. The scenario is warned in might_sleep().
Fix it by using spin_lock_irqsave() instead of the primitive spin_lock()
to save the irq status before entering wait_event_lock_irq() and using
spin_unlock_irqrestore() instead of the primitive spin_unlock() to restore
the irq status before entering wait_for_completion().
Before the change:
idxd_cmd_exec() {
interrupt is on
spin_lock() // interrupt is on
wait_event_lock_irq()
spin_unlock_irq() // interrupt is enabled
...
spin_lock_irq() // interrupt is disabled
spin_unlock() // interrupt is still disabled
wait_for_completion() // report "BUG: sleeping function
// called from invalid context...
// in_atomic() irqs_disabled()"
}
After applying spin_lock_irqsave():
idxd_cmd_exec() {
interrupt is on
spin_lock_irqsave() // save the on state
// interrupt is disabled
wait_event_lock_irq()
spin_unlock_irq() // interrupt is enabled
...
spin_lock_irq() // interrupt is disabled
spin_unlock_irqrestore() // interrupt is restored to on
wait_for_completion() // No Call trace
}
Fixes: f9f4082 ("dmaengine: idxd: remove interrupt disable for cmd_lock")
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
0 commit comments