|
| 1 | +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| 2 | +
|
| 3 | +====================== |
| 4 | +BIOS/EFI Configuration |
| 5 | +====================== |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +BIOS and EFI are largely responsible for configuring static information about |
| 8 | +devices (or potential future devices) such that Linux can build the appropriate |
| 9 | +logical representations of these devices. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +At a high level, this is what occurs during this phase of configuration. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +* The bootloader starts the BIOS/EFI. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +* BIOS/EFI do early device probe to determine static configuration |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +* BIOS/EFI creates ACPI Tables that describe static config for the OS |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +* BIOS/EFI create the system memory map (EFI Memory Map, E820, etc) |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +* BIOS/EFI calls :code:`start_kernel` and begins the Linux Early Boot process. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Much of what this section is concerned with is ACPI Table production and |
| 24 | +static memory map configuration. More detail on these tables can be found |
| 25 | +under Platform Configuration -> ACPI Table Reference. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +.. note:: |
| 28 | + Platform Vendors should read carefully, as this sections has recommendations |
| 29 | + on physical memory region size and alignment, memory holes, HDM interleave, |
| 30 | + and what linux expects of HDM decoders trying to work with these features. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +UEFI Settings |
| 33 | +============= |
| 34 | +If your platform supports it, the :code:`uefisettings` command can be used to |
| 35 | +read/write EFI settings. Changes will be reflected on the next reboot. Kexec |
| 36 | +is not a sufficient reboot. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +One notable configuration here is the EFI_MEMORY_SP (Specific Purpose) bit. |
| 39 | +When this is enabled, this bit tells linux to defer management of a memory |
| 40 | +region to a driver (in this case, the CXL driver). Otherwise, the memory is |
| 41 | +treated as "normal memory", and is exposed to the page allocator during |
| 42 | +:code:`__init`. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +uefisettings examples |
| 45 | +--------------------- |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +:code:`uefisettings identify` :: |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + uefisettings identify |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + bios_vendor: xxx |
| 52 | + bios_version: xxx |
| 53 | + bios_release: xxx |
| 54 | + bios_date: xxx |
| 55 | + product_name: xxx |
| 56 | + product_family: xxx |
| 57 | + product_version: xxx |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +On some AMD platforms, the :code:`EFI_MEMORY_SP` bit is set via the :code:`CXL |
| 60 | +Memory Attribute` field. This may be called something else on your platform. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +:code:`uefisettings get "CXL Memory Attribute"` :: |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | + selector: xxx |
| 65 | + ... |
| 66 | + question: Question { |
| 67 | + name: "CXL Memory Attribute", |
| 68 | + answer: "Enabled", |
| 69 | + ... |
| 70 | + } |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Physical Memory Map |
| 73 | +=================== |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +Physical Address Region Alignment |
| 76 | +--------------------------------- |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +As of Linux v6.14, the hotplug memory system requires memory regions to be |
| 79 | +uniform in size and alignment. While the CXL specification allows for memory |
| 80 | +regions as small as 256MB, the supported memory block size and alignment for |
| 81 | +hotplugged memory is architecture-defined. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +A Linux memory blocks may be as small as 128MB and increase in powers of two. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +* On ARM, the default block size and alignment is either 128MB or 256MB. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +* On x86, the default block size is 256MB, and increases to 2GB as the |
| 88 | + capacity of the system increases up to 64GB. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +For best support across versions, platform vendors should place CXL memory at |
| 91 | +a 2GB aligned base address, and regions should be 2GB aligned. This also helps |
| 92 | +prevent the creating thousands of memory devices (one per block). |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +Memory Holes |
| 95 | +------------ |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +Holes in the memory map are tricky. Consider a 4GB device located at base |
| 98 | +address 0x100000000, but with the following memory map :: |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + --------------------- |
| 101 | + | 0x100000000 | |
| 102 | + | CXL | |
| 103 | + | 0x1BFFFFFFF | |
| 104 | + --------------------- |
| 105 | + | 0x1C0000000 | |
| 106 | + | MEMORY HOLE | |
| 107 | + | 0x1FFFFFFFF | |
| 108 | + --------------------- |
| 109 | + | 0x200000000 | |
| 110 | + | CXL CONT. | |
| 111 | + | 0x23FFFFFFF | |
| 112 | + --------------------- |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +There are two issues to consider: |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +* decoder programming, and |
| 117 | +* memory block alignment. |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +If your architecture requires 2GB uniform size and aligned memory blocks, the |
| 120 | +only capacity Linux is capable of mapping (as of v6.14) would be the capacity |
| 121 | +from `0x100000000-0x180000000`. The remaining capacity will be stranded, as |
| 122 | +they are not of 2GB aligned length. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +Assuming your architecture and memory configuration allows 1GB memory blocks, |
| 125 | +this memory map is supported and this should be presented as multiple CFMWS |
| 126 | +in the CEDT that describe each side of the memory hole separately - along with |
| 127 | +matching decoders. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +Multiple decoders can (and should) be used to manage such a memory hole (see |
| 130 | +below), but each chunk of a memory hole should be aligned to a reasonable block |
| 131 | +size (larger alignment is always better). If you intend to have memory holes |
| 132 | +in the memory map, expect to use one decoder per contiguous chunk of host |
| 133 | +physical memory. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +As of v6.14, Linux does provide support for memory hotplug of multiple |
| 136 | +physical memory regions separated by a memory hole described by a single |
| 137 | +HDM decoder. |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +Decoder Programming |
| 141 | +=================== |
| 142 | +If BIOS/EFI intends to program the decoders to be statically configured, |
| 143 | +there are a few things to consider to avoid major pitfalls that will |
| 144 | +prevent Linux compatibility. Some of these recommendations are not |
| 145 | +required "per the specification", but Linux makes no guarantees of support |
| 146 | +otherwise. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +Translation Point |
| 150 | +----------------- |
| 151 | +Per the specification, the only decoders which **TRANSLATE** Host Physical |
| 152 | +Address (HPA) to Device Physical Address (DPA) are the **Endpoint Decoders**. |
| 153 | +All other decoders in the fabric are intended to route accesses without |
| 154 | +translating the addresses. |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +This is heavily implied by the specification, see: :: |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | + CXL Specification 3.1 |
| 159 | + 8.2.4.20: CXL HDM Decoder Capability Structure |
| 160 | + - Implementation Note: CXL Host Bridge and Upstream Switch Port Decoder Flow |
| 161 | + - Implementation Note: Device Decoder Logic |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Given this, Linux makes a strong assumption that decoders between CPU and |
| 164 | +endpoint will all be programmed with addresses ranges that are subsets of |
| 165 | +their parent decoder. |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +Due to some ambiguity in how Architecture, ACPI, PCI, and CXL specifications |
| 168 | +"hand off" responsibility between domains, some early adopting platforms |
| 169 | +attempted to do translation at the originating memory controller or host |
| 170 | +bridge. This configuration requires a platform specific extension to the |
| 171 | +driver and is not officially endorsed - despite being supported. |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +It is *highly recommended* **NOT** to do this; otherwise, you are on your own |
| 174 | +to implement driver support for your platform. |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +Interleave and Configuration Flexibility |
| 177 | +---------------------------------------- |
| 178 | +If providing cross-host-bridge interleave, a CFMWS entry in the CEDT must be |
| 179 | +presented with target host-bridges for the interleaved device sets (there may |
| 180 | +be multiple behind each host bridge). |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +If providing intra-host-bridge interleaving, only 1 CFMWS entry in the CEDT is |
| 183 | +required for that host bridge - if it covers the entire capacity of the devices |
| 184 | +behind the host bridge. |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +If intending to provide users flexibility in programming decoders beyond the |
| 187 | +root, you may want to provide multiple CFMWS entries in the CEDT intended for |
| 188 | +different purposes. For example, you may want to consider adding: |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +1) A CFMWS entry to cover all interleavable host bridges. |
| 191 | +2) A CFMWS entry to cover all devices on a single host bridge. |
| 192 | +3) A CFMWS entry to cover each device. |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +A platform may choose to add all of these, or change the mode based on a BIOS |
| 195 | +setting. For each CFMWS entry, Linux expects descriptions of the described |
| 196 | +memory regions in the SRAT to determine the number of NUMA nodes it should |
| 197 | +reserve during early boot / init. |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +As of v6.14, Linux will create a NUMA node for each CEDT CFMWS entry, even if |
| 200 | +a matching SRAT entry does not exist; however, this is not guaranteed in the |
| 201 | +future and such a configuration should be avoided. |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +Memory Holes |
| 204 | +------------ |
| 205 | +If your platform includes memory holes intersparsed between your CXL memory, it |
| 206 | +is recommended to utilize multiple decoders to cover these regions of memory, |
| 207 | +rather than try to program the decoders to accept the entire range and expect |
| 208 | +Linux to manage the overlap. |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +For example, consider the Memory Hole described above :: |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | + --------------------- |
| 213 | + | 0x100000000 | |
| 214 | + | CXL | |
| 215 | + | 0x1BFFFFFFF | |
| 216 | + --------------------- |
| 217 | + | 0x1C0000000 | |
| 218 | + | MEMORY HOLE | |
| 219 | + | 0x1FFFFFFFF | |
| 220 | + --------------------- |
| 221 | + | 0x200000000 | |
| 222 | + | CXL CONT. | |
| 223 | + | 0x23FFFFFFF | |
| 224 | + --------------------- |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +Assuming this is provided by a single device attached directly to a host bridge, |
| 227 | +Linux would expect the following decoder programming :: |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 230 | + | root-decoder-0 | | root-decoder-1 | |
| 231 | + | base: 0x100000000 | | base: 0x200000000 | |
| 232 | + | size: 0xC0000000 | | size: 0x40000000 | |
| 233 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 234 | + | | |
| 235 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 236 | + | HB-decoder-0 | | HB-decoder-1 | |
| 237 | + | base: 0x100000000 | | base: 0x200000000 | |
| 238 | + | size: 0xC0000000 | | size: 0x40000000 | |
| 239 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 240 | + | | |
| 241 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 242 | + | ep-decoder-0 | | ep-decoder-1 | |
| 243 | + | base: 0x100000000 | | base: 0x200000000 | |
| 244 | + | size: 0xC0000000 | | size: 0x40000000 | |
| 245 | + ----------------------- ----------------------- |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +With a CEDT configuration with two CFMWS describing the above root decoders. |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +Linux makes no guarantee of support for strange memory hole situations. |
| 250 | + |
| 251 | +Multi-Media Devices |
| 252 | +------------------- |
| 253 | +The CFMWS field of the CEDT has special restriction bits which describe whether |
| 254 | +the described memory region allows volatile or persistent memory (or both). If |
| 255 | +the platform intends to support either: |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +1) A device with multiple medias, or |
| 258 | +2) Using a persistent memory device as normal memory |
| 259 | + |
| 260 | +A platform may wish to create multiple CEDT CFMWS entries to describe the same |
| 261 | +memory, with the intent of allowing the end user flexibility in how that memory |
| 262 | +is configured. Linux does not presently have strong requirements in this area. |
0 commit comments