You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of my recent PRs to reduce header dependencies of
`id/item/range/etc.` has caused some compile time errors downstream with
`std::ignore` not being declared because we use different version of STL
than the one in the upstream CI.
We do want to have our device headers as lightweight as
possible (especially in the context of SYCL RTC), so it makes sense to
just use `(void)` uniformly instead of `std::ignore`. UR experience
also found that the compile-time price of `(void)` is smaller as well.
0 commit comments