You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is similar to #20455 - there is a bunch of places where
we call `std::move(const obj &)`, but target classes do not provide
`obj(const &&)` move constructors, falling back to regular `obj(const
&)` copy constructor, thus making the `std::move` useless and confusing.
This should also help clean up the Coverity scan
(https://scan.coverity.com/projects/intel-llvm?tab=overview), see CIDs
`535398`, `535480`, `535420` and `535554`. By some reason Coverity
thinks that we are using a moved object, whilst in fact no moves were
performed, only copies.
0 commit comments