Interagent schema not valid

[FreekingDean]

Not sure if this is the best place to put this, but I believe the schema should be valid, however when running the tools supplied I see that it is not.

schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/identity: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/link/properties/href: failed schema #/definitions/resource/properties/properties/patternProperties/^[a-z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9]$: No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/link/properties/schema: failed schema #/definitions/resource/properties/properties/patternProperties/^[a-z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9]$: No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/link: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/ref: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resource/properties/links: failed schema #/definitions/resource/properties/properties/patternProperties/^[a-z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9]$: No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resource/properties/properties: failed schema #/definitions/resource/properties/properties/patternProperties/^[a-z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9]$: No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resource/properties/strictProperties: failed schema #/definitions/resource/properties/properties/patternProperties/^[a-z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9]$: No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resource: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resourceDefinition: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/definitions/resourceProperty: failed schema #/properties/definitions/additionalProperties: "definitions", "description", "links", "title", "type" weren't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/definitions: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "additionalProperties" is not a permitted key.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/definitions: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "$ref" wasn't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/links: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "additionalProperties" is not a permitted key.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/links: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "$ref" wasn't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/properties: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "additionalProperties" is not a permitted key.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #/properties/properties: failed schema #/properties/properties/additionalProperties: "$ref" wasn't supplied.
schemas/interagent-hyper-schema.json: #: failed schema #: "description", "links", "type" weren't supplied.

[geemus]

It's been quite some time since I worked on/around this stuff, but I think it might be expected that this particular schema is not valid on it's own. I think instead it is expected to be a base schema/starting point that you would join other things on top of (or add to) in order to get a full valid schema. (some of the tests seem like they may confirm this, but again I feel really fuzzy on details). Is there a particular reason you would need or want this to be valid, or you just checked and were surprised that it was not?

[FreekingDean]

I was looking to use the tooling to generate docs on this schema. I believe the other base json-schema meta schemas are valid, I may be alone in wanting this though! :D

[geemus]

I'm open to supporting a fix if we can figure it out, but am afraid I probably don't have much bandwidth to work on such a fix myself. If you'd like to work on it, I'd certainly be happy to have it and/or to answer questions if you have them. What do you think?