Switch plaintext sections

[SebastianSupreme]

Describe your changes

The two plaintext sections have been placed incorrectly.
Now that I switched them, the whole paragraph makes sense again.

Files changed

docs/how-to/address-ipfs-on-web.md

Does this update depend on any other PRs?

No.

[welcome]

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

• The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions and stakeholders linked/mentioned.
• Your contribution itself is clear (grammar and spelling checked, any code blocks checked and commented) and in its best form. Follow the docs contribution guidelines if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

• A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high priority items.
• The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.
• The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

[TMoMoreau]

This makes sense to me.

[SebastianSupreme]

Sorry, accidentally closed this a few minutes ago. 😅
I'm glad you reopened it. 🫡

[ElPaisano]

Hi @SebastianSupreme thank you for taking the time read our docs and open this pull request.

After reviewing this PR / merging in the latest from main, I would propose that a change before this is merged: 51182c1. I do understand the confusion here that prompted this PR, but I do not think the plaintext sections should be switched - I think that they were in the correct location, but the writing and section formatting / structure made it unclear. Your PR indicates that this page needs improvement. So, in the commit above, I regrouped, rewrote and rearranged some of the content in the section to hopefully better clarify the different ways to construct path URLs given an IPFS id. I may be incorrect here, but this is the way I am interpreting this section.

The draft is here https://bafybeig5irfij4ehycf2sr5mslnfpsp5th73vmj5kpfa3k4oxokcejbigq.on.fleek.co/how-to/address-ipfs-on-web/#path-gateway

Hopefully this addresses the issue here. Thank you for the PR and the feedback, and apologies for the confusion here.

[SebastianSupreme]

@ElPaisano Thank you for your time to review my PR.
I've discovered a minor mistake in your new commit where you put a misleading example in the ipns section.
I put it back in its rightful place though I'd appreciate it if you could add a proper ipns example to the respective section because now it's missing one.

[ElPaisano]

@2color could you take a quick look at this draft / PR and let us know if you think the latest updates are the correct resolution?

[TMoMoreau]

@ElPaisano This was a misunderstanding of the doc on my part, after reading the page again and getting a better understanding of the content, your changes make sense. I'm going to do one more quick pass and approve again.

[SebastianSupreme]

@ElPaisano @TMoMoreau
Can we merge this PR now?
The requested changes have been implemented.