-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Open
Description
Purpose
This issue is a placeholder to link docs, issues, PRs, etc. concerning software that is targeted for IPFS Gateways.
Background
Many (most?) Gateways Providers use go-ipfs or some forked version. go-ipfs is in a challenging position of being a single binary supporting desktop application and web-service needs via configuration. go-ipfs maintainers are concerned that we're either not serving either party very well and/or more slowly than we ought.
What are we going to do?
We are not committed to any changes yet, but we believe it's appropriate to at the minimum:
- Check in and review current Gateway operator usecases and understand Gateway operator needs/wants.
- Determine if a separate/different development effort targeted towards gateways would be appropriate. Should the answer be yes, the next step would be to create a plan as a community and also execute it as a collective.
Feel free to link/post ideas/thoughts, and go-ipfs maintainers will as well.
When are we going to do anything?
go-ipfs maintainers are focused on the 0.11 and 0.12 releases for 2021Q4, but will be having the conversations above in parallel.
Additional Notes
- This likely should be a GitHub Discussion rather than issue, but consciously not taking that on now to avoid slowing down getting the issue started. We can certainly move to a Discussion after.
- There is chatter happening on this in Filecoin Slack #ipfs-operators as well. I'll pull out relevant pieces here as well.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
kind/featureA new featureA new feature