Help Needed: Adapting pre_trained_policy_action.py
for Dual Policy in Multi-Policy Hierarchical RL
#1545
Replies: 2 comments
-
Thanks for posting this. The discussion is closed, but let us know if you'd like to reopen it and we will aim to follow up soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hello @RandomOakForest, Thank you for following up. My multi-policy hierarchical reinforcement learning project is currently on hold. I’d appreciate your support if I resume it in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear All,
I need help.
I’ve been working on a project involving hierarchical reinforcement learning with two low-level policies, using the navigation demo code as a reference, but I’ve hit a roadblock.
My plan is to input the two policy information into
pre_trained_policy_action.py
, process them based on commands, select the appropriate policy for each actor, generate a new action tensor, and apply it to the simulation usingself._low_level_action_term.apply_actions()
.However, I’m struggling to correctly handle the command retrieval process within this script.
What is the proper way to implement command retrieval in
pre_trained_policy_action.py
?Alternatively, would it be inappropriate to modify this script to include custom logic?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions