Thank you for the PR and sorry for the late response!

Yeah, I guess it's time to modernize the Qt variant. However, I think I would rather introduce it as another variant.

However, I wonder about the Invalid code: why did you choose -1 as value for the invalid code? Why not 0?

Thank you for the PR and sorry for the late response!

Yeah, I guess it's time to modernize the Qt variant. However, I think I would rather introduce it as another variant.

However, I wonder about the Invalid code: why did you choose -1 as value for the invalid code? Why not 0?

I guess 0 could used instead. It's just -1 a common undefined :)

I guess 0 could used instead. It's just -1 a common undefined :)

Oh well... in the meantime I realized that I already defined -1 to be the "invalid" code implicitly. 😆

I implemented it as a new variant and pushed it to https://github.com/j-ulrich/http-status-codes-cpp/tree/feature/%2328-Qt-Cpp11.
What do you think?

Implemented in #30.
Released in version 1.6.0, however I made a mistake during release so use 1.6.2 instead.