Add analyzers field to refactoring-rule and refactoring-suite types

Co-authored-by: jackfirth <[email protected]>

Author: Copilot

base.rkt

@@ -14,12 +14,14 @@
  (contract-out
   [refactoring-rule? (-> any/c boolean?)]
   [refactoring-rule-description (-> refactoring-rule? immutable-string?)]
+  [refactoring-rule-analyzers (-> refactoring-rule? (listof expansion-analyzer?))]
   [refactoring-suite? (-> any/c boolean?)]
   [refactoring-suite
    (->* ()
         (#:rules (sequence/c refactoring-rule?) #:name (or/c interned-symbol? #false))
         refactoring-suite?)]
-  [refactoring-suite-rules (-> refactoring-suite? (listof refactoring-rule?))]))
+  [refactoring-suite-rules (-> refactoring-suite? (listof refactoring-rule?))]
+  [refactoring-suite-analyzers (-> refactoring-suite? (listof expansion-analyzer?))]))
 
 
 (module+ private
@@ -33,12 +35,17 @@
                      racket/list
                      racket/syntax
                      resyntax/private/more-syntax-parse-classes)
+         racket/list
          racket/sequence
          rebellion/base/immutable-string
          rebellion/base/option
          rebellion/base/symbol
          rebellion/type/object
+         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/identifier-usage
+         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/ignored-result-values
+         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/variable-mutability
          resyntax/default-recommendations/private/definition-context
+         resyntax/private/analyzer
          resyntax/private/logger
          resyntax/private/source
          resyntax/private/syntax-neighbors
@@ -98,7 +105,7 @@
     [(_ new-stx) (syntax-property #'new-stx 'focus-replacement-on #true)]))
 
 
-(define-object-type refactoring-rule (transformer description uses-universal-tagged-syntax?)
+(define-object-type refactoring-rule (transformer description uses-universal-tagged-syntax? analyzers)
   #:omit-root-binding
   #:constructor-name constructor:refactoring-rule)
 
@@ -149,6 +156,9 @@
      #:name 'id
      #:description (string->immutable-string description.c)
      #:uses-universal-tagged-syntax? (~? uses-universal-tagged-syntax? #false)
+     #:analyzers (list identifier-usage-analyzer
+                       ignored-result-values-analyzer
+                       variable-mutability-analyzer)
      #:transformer
      (λ (stx)
        (syntax-parse stx
@@ -218,13 +228,17 @@
       expression.refactored)))
 
 
-(define-object-type refactoring-suite (rules)
+(define-object-type refactoring-suite (rules analyzers)
   #:constructor-name constructor:refactoring-suite
   #:omit-root-binding)
 
 
 (define (refactoring-suite #:rules [rules '()] #:name [name #false])
-  (constructor:refactoring-suite #:rules (sequence->list rules) #:name name))
+  (define rule-list (sequence->list rules))
+  (define combined-analyzers
+    (remove-duplicates
+     (append-map refactoring-rule-analyzers rule-list)))
+  (constructor:refactoring-suite #:rules rule-list #:analyzers combined-analyzers #:name name))
 
 
 (begin-for-syntax
@@ -249,3 +263,56 @@
     (refactoring-suite
      #:name 'id
      #:rules (append rules.as-list-expr suites.as-list-expr))))
+
+
+(module+ test
+  (require rackunit
+           resyntax/private/analyzer)
+
+  (test-case "refactoring-rule stores analyzers"
+    (define-refactoring-rule test-rule
+      #:description "test rule"
+      pattern
+      replacement)
+    
+    (check-true (refactoring-rule? test-rule))
+    (check-equal? (length (refactoring-rule-analyzers test-rule)) 3)
+    (check-true (andmap expansion-analyzer? (refactoring-rule-analyzers test-rule))))
+
+  (test-case "refactoring-suite combines analyzers from rules"
+    (define-refactoring-rule rule1
+      #:description "rule 1"
+      pattern1
+      replacement1)
+    
+    (define-refactoring-rule rule2
+      #:description "rule 2"
+      pattern2
+      replacement2)
+    
+    (define suite (refactoring-suite #:rules (list rule1 rule2)))
+    
+    (check-true (refactoring-suite? suite))
+    (check-equal? (length (refactoring-suite-rules suite)) 2)
+    ;; All rules have the same analyzers, so the combined list should have 3 unique analyzers
+    (check-equal? (length (refactoring-suite-analyzers suite)) 3)
+    (check-true (andmap expansion-analyzer? (refactoring-suite-analyzers suite))))
+
+  (test-case "nested suites combine analyzers correctly"
+    (define-refactoring-rule inner-rule
+      #:description "inner rule"
+      inner-pattern
+      inner-replacement)
+    
+    (define inner-suite (refactoring-suite #:rules (list inner-rule)))
+    
+    (define-refactoring-rule outer-rule
+      #:description "outer rule"
+      outer-pattern
+      outer-replacement)
+    
+    (define outer-suite (refactoring-suite #:rules (list outer-rule inner-rule)))
+    
+    (check-equal? (length (refactoring-suite-analyzers inner-suite)) 3)
+    ;; Both rules have the same analyzers, so deduplicated should still be 3
+    (check-equal? (length (refactoring-suite-analyzers outer-suite)) 3)))

main.rkt

@@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
          rebellion/type/record
          resyntax/base
          resyntax/default-recommendations
-         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/identifier-usage
-         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/ignored-result-values
-         resyntax/default-recommendations/analyzers/variable-mutability
          resyntax/private/analysis
          resyntax/private/comment-reader
          resyntax/private/git
@@ -75,6 +72,7 @@
 (module+ test
   (require racket/list
            rackunit
+           resyntax/private/analyzer
            (submod "..")))
 
 
@@ -211,9 +209,7 @@
     (with-handlers ([exn:fail? skip])
       (define analysis (source-analyze source
                                        #:lines lines
-                                       #:analyzers (list identifier-usage-analyzer
-                                                         ignored-result-values-analyzer
-                                                         variable-mutability-analyzer)))
+                                       #:analyzers (refactoring-suite-analyzers effective-suite)))
       (refactor-visited-forms
        #:analysis analysis #:suite effective-suite #:comments comments #:lines lines)))
 
@@ -242,9 +238,7 @@
                   [exn:fail:filesystem:missing-module? skip]
                   [exn:fail:contract:variable? skip])
     (define analysis (source-analyze source
-                                     #:analyzers (list identifier-usage-analyzer
-                                                       ignored-result-values-analyzer
-                                                       variable-mutability-analyzer)))
+                                     #:analyzers (refactoring-suite-analyzers suite)))
     (source-code-analysis-added-syntax-properties analysis)))
 
 
@@ -475,4 +469,11 @@
     (check-equal? (refactoring-result-string-replacement (first results))
                   (string-replacement #:start 13
                                       #:end 28
-                                      #:contents (list (inserted-string "(or 1 2 3)"))))))
+                                      #:contents (list (inserted-string "(or 1 2 3)")))))
+  
+  (test-case "resyntax-analyze uses suite analyzers"
+    (define test-suite default-recommendations)
+    (check-true (list? (refactoring-suite-analyzers test-suite)))
+    (check-false (empty? (refactoring-suite-analyzers test-suite)))
+    ;; Verify that all analyzers in the suite are expansion-analyzer?
+    (check-true (andmap expansion-analyzer? (refactoring-suite-analyzers test-suite)))))