type transition is to 'unconfined_service_t' and not 'unconfined_t' in lab03

[pranlawate]

It feels like a typo in the following line :

We can see there is a rule specifically allowing process transition for anything started using the init_t type to the unconfined_t type, which confirms our original suspicion (there will be more output, but I've omitted this for clarity).

It should be corrected as

We can see there is a rule specifically allowing process transition for anything started using the init_t type to the unconfined_service_t type, which confirms our original suspicion (there will be more output, but I've omitted this for clarity).

[jamesfreeman959]

Thank you for this and sorry for my slow reply. Taking a look. What OS did you test on out of interest?

[pranlawate]

Hey james, I believe I tested that on a Fedora machine. I will cross check and reply back if it's a different OS.

…

On 18 Sept 2025 at 19:06, James Freeman ***@***.***> wrote: jamesfreeman959 left a comment (jamesfreeman959/selinux-hands-on-labs#20) Thank you for this and sorry for my slow reply. Taking a look. What OS did you test on out of interest? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[pranlawate]

Hello, I was wrong about using fedora.
It was a RHEL 9.6 system with selinux-policy-targeted-38.1.53-5.el9_6.noarch installed.