[Feature Request]: Bring "Control Charts for Attributes" at the same wonderful level of the Variables Charts

[bensagalovsky]

Description

Enable for the Attribute charts some features already present for Variables charts

Purpose

Enable better display of the charts and better identification of out of control points.

Use-case

Any situation demanding an Attributes chart

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No response

Is your feature request related to a JASP module?

Quality Control

Describe the solution you would like

Having, for Attribute Charts, some features already present for Variables charts (see "Additional context" below)

Describe alternatives that you have considered

No response

Additional context

These are the features from Variables charts that would be great to have for the Attributes charts:

1. Stages
2. Noting the Test results with an indication of the Timestamp, and not only of the Point number.
3. Having the time axis labels spaced properly to avoid overlapping, particularly when a Timestamp is present

As an aside, the Y-axis labels for the c and u chart are indicated as if they were np and p charts (Defectives and Proportion) instead of as Defects and Defects per unit. But this is secondary, as it can be corrected by editing the image.
Once again, thanks for offering this Quality Control module, and please excuse me for sitll asking for more! Best regards.

[tomtomme]

@bensagalovsky
thx fore the requests :)
They certainly sound reasonable. Let us hope that the developers find some time to implement them.

[JTPetter]

Yes, the control chart for attributes are indeed the only part of the module that did not yet receive this makeover. It is planned, but has somewhat lower priority, as it appears that these charts are not as widely used.

[bensagalovsky]

Agree a 100% about the priority. I am thinking of using this in training, but for practical use it is the variables charts that matter.

BTW, on variables charts I notice that often plotted points do not turn red when they failed a test, even Test 1. Is that a bug or a feature? If it is unintended let me know and I can submit an example.

Thank you very much for your thoughtful responses. Regards.