You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ptp: prevent possible ABBA deadlock in ptp_clock_freerun()
syzbot reported the following ABBA deadlock:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
n_vclocks_store()
lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux) [1]
(physical clock)
pc_clock_adjtime()
lock(&clk->rwsem) [2]
(physical clock)
...
ptp_clock_freerun()
ptp_vclock_in_use()
lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux) [3]
(physical clock)
ptp_clock_unregister()
posix_clock_unregister()
lock(&clk->rwsem) [4]
(virtual clock)
Since ptp virtual clock is registered only under ptp physical clock, both
ptp_clock and posix_clock must be physical clocks for ptp_vclock_in_use()
to lock &ptp->n_vclocks_mux and check ptp->n_vclocks.
However, when unregistering vclocks in n_vclocks_store(), the locking
ptp->n_vclocks_mux is a physical clock lock, but clk->rwsem of
ptp_clock_unregister() called through device_for_each_child_reverse()
is a virtual clock lock.
Therefore, clk->rwsem used in CPU0 and clk->rwsem used in CPU1 are
different locks, but in lockdep, a false positive occurs because the
possibility of deadlock is determined through lock-class.
To solve this, lock subclass annotation must be added to the posix_clock
rwsem of the vclock.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7cfb66a237c4a5fb22ad
Fixes: 73f3706 ("ptp: support ptp physical/virtual clocks conversion")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
0 commit comments