net/mlx5e: Fix overrun reported by coverity

Coverity Scan reports the following issue. But it's impossible that
mlx5_get_dev_index returns 7 for PF, even if the index is calculated
from PCI FUNC ID. So add the checking to make coverity slience.

CID 610894 (#2 of 2): Out-of-bounds write (OVERRUN)
Overrunning array esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules of 4 8-byte
elements at element index 7 (byte offset 63) using index
mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev) (which evaluates to 7).

Fixes: 9bee385 ("net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]>

Author: Jianbo Liu

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c

@@ -1177,9 +1177,9 @@ static int esw_add_fdb_peer_miss_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 	struct mlx5_flow_handle *flow;
 	struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec;
 	struct mlx5_vport *vport;
+	int err, pfindex;
 	unsigned long i;
 	void *misc;
-	int err;
 
 	if (!MLX5_VPORT_MANAGER(esw->dev) && !mlx5_core_is_ecpf_esw_manager(esw->dev))
 		return 0;
@@ -1255,7 +1255,15 @@ static int esw_add_fdb_peer_miss_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 			flows[vport->index] = flow;
 		}
 	}
-	esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules[mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev)] = flows;
+
+	pfindex = mlx5_get_dev_index(peer_dev);
+	if (pfindex >= MLX5_MAX_PORTS) {
+		esw_warn(esw->dev, "Peer dev index(%d) is over the max num defined(%d)\n",
+			 pfindex, MLX5_MAX_PORTS);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto add_ec_vf_flow_err;
+	}
+	esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_rules[pfindex] = flows;
 
 	kvfree(spec);
 	return 0;