Make plugin Group IDs optional in the YAML specification

[oleg-nenashev]

Custom WAR Packager 2.x uses the Jenkins update center to retrieve the plugin information, and it can also do pluginID => groupId/artifactId mapping . There is no need to strictly require Group IDs in the current Custom WAR Packager implementation.

Acceptance criteria

• groupId field is now optional when Update Center Plugin plugin info Provider s used
• There is a groupId resolution logic in Custom WAR Packager. This logic is invoked if there is no Group ID is specified for a plugin field
• There is a test coverage for specifications without Group ID

[hp77-creator]

@oleg-nenashev is this something one will have to update in the documentation? What changes are expected here?

[dohoangkhiem]

This is really useful, ideally, I think the plugin input format would be the same as https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-installation-manager-tool#plugin-input-format, so we can feed a txt file with only artifact ID and version "latest" for all.

TBH, having no support for the "latest" could be a disaster when it comes to dependency mess.

[oleg-nenashev]

I agree, the formats should be aligned

…

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, 05:52 Do Hoang Khiem, ***@***.***> wrote: This is really useful, ideally, I think the plugin input format would be the same as https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-installation-manager-tool#plugin-input-format, so we can feed a txt file with only artifact ID and version "latest" for all. TBH, having no support for the "latest" could be a disaster when it comes to dependency mess. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#171 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAW4RIEQPYTDUSKYP7GHCELULSMSBANCNFSM4RLOCT4Q> .

[potter-cmd]

@oleg-nenashev Is anyone working on this?

[oleg-nenashev]

Yes, there is a submitted pull request

[potter-cmd]

Can i join any project? can you please a send a links that i can contribute

…

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 5:49 PM Oleg Nenashev ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, there is a submitted pull request — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#171 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZGPLHGFCNFGVEX7BLPJHFTWZH2EXANCNFSM4RLOCT4Q> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>