Skip to content

link attribute lacks documentation how it is supposed to be used #457

@daniel-beck

Description

@daniel-beck

Jenkins and plugins versions report

n/a

What Operating System are you using (both controller, and any agents involved in the problem)?

n/a

Reproduction steps

n/a

Expected Results

n/a

Actual Results

n/a

Anything else?

link is a feature unsupported by the current plugin UI (#455). It's only mentioned superficially in the README.

I think SVGs embedded elsewhere as img simply never support onclick in modern browsers, if it ever worked, the risk is simply too great. It was added by @thomas-dee in c13abaa, without usage instructions or pull request, so there is no related discussion. #370 similarly expresses confusion:

That seems to indicate that the "link" parameter is only really useful if you are able to write a script that makes a web request to the icon page and embeds the response content into an HTML document or extracts the target link to create a new hyperlinked image. Such a use case isn't mentioned in the docs though.

That means only standalone access in a separate window is left. I guess it works with an iframe? That seems like a weird, narrow use case TBH.

This feature needs documentation how it is supposed to be used.

Are you interested in contributing a fix?

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No fields configured for Bug.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions