key? alias to has_key? in pg_json_opts

[opya]

Hi,

I was wondering if it's wrong if we add one more alias key? here:

sequel/lib/sequel/extensions/pg_json_ops.rb

Line 475 in 2dd31a7

alias include? has_key?

[jeremyevans]

I generally am against unnecessary aliases. include? is common enough that I made an exception for it. I personally don't like key? as a method name as to me in reads like "is the receiver a key" instead of "does the receiver have the given key". It's easy to add the alias yourself, if you want.

[opya]

ok, thank you