[docs] fix docusaurus due to previous upgrade being incompatible #2710
+79
−1,860
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Docusaurus was failing to start due to an incompatible upgrade in #2684:
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '@theme/ResponseSamples'
Also updated README to reflect new tooling.
Finally, I tried to fix the local
pnpm start
opening tolocalhost:3000/docs/devbox
but didn't succeed for now. Left a note in the README to alert developers about it.Upgrade Fix
The new version uses a completely different component structure - it no longer uses ResponseSamples or ResponseExamples directly in the generated MDX. Instead, it uses a different set of components like StatusCodes, RequestSchema, etc.
Files Updated
These files now use the updated component structure compatible with docusaurus-theme-openapi-docs v4.5.1.
How was it tested?
devbox run start
and opened devbox docs as well as the Nixhub docs.devbox run build
anddevbox run serve
and opened the docs again in localhost, just to be safe and ensure the production environment will work in Vercel.Community Contribution License
All community contributions in this pull request are licensed to the project
maintainers under the terms of the
Apache 2 License.
By creating this pull request, I represent that I have the right to license the
contributions to the project maintainers under the Apache 2 License as stated in
the
Community Contribution License.