Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Maybe. But this was all implemented before we had extensions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thank you for the quick response. I completely understand that things happen for historical reasons. It also shows that extensions are a good abstraction, if they allow to reduce the number of options for pandoc. Would it be a huge effort to offer the same functionality as already implemented in https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#math-rendering-in-html via extensions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There are several options in pandoc for configuring math rendering in HTML files: https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#math-rendering-in-html
Why are these implemented as pandoc options and not as extensions? What I mean is why is the command to convert to HTML with mathjax support like
instead of
Wouldn't it be more consistent to have math-rendering in HTML configured as extensions instead of options?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions