Skip to content

Commit 1d00dd3

Browse files
Clarify ratios are not absolute numbers
1 parent a2e3de7 commit 1d00dd3

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

src/content/posts/2025-04-03-still-measuring-devs-with-leetcode.mdx

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Much to my chagrin, I didn't make it far in the interview process, because
8989
almost every company I've interviewed with this year still uses LeetCode-style
9090
interviews. If a company even gives the heads up of what to expect in an
9191
interview, don't necessary believe, "Our live code assessment uses real-world
92-
problems." In 9/10 of my interviews this year, the technical step was still
92+
problems." In 90% of my interviews this year, the technical step was still
9393
LeetCode in a trenchcoat.
9494

9595
I was rusty at these live coding interviews, because in my 14 year career,
@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ questions about the job. The interview for mutual fit turns out not to be a
103103
2-way street. It's dehumanizing for the experienced dev.
104104

105105
When I'm rejected after an interview, in my spirit of continual improvement, I
106-
ask for feedback why. 9/10 companies are cagey, to cover their ass. So I'm not
106+
ask for feedback why. 90% of companies responded cagily with a non-answer or
107+
that it was not their policy to share feedback, to cover their ass. So I'm not
107108
fully certain all the reasons I was rejected over the last 12 months. I might
108109
have a worse personality than I think. Maybe a member of the hiring panel was
109110
underslept and cranky. All I know is, the interview process ending _correlated_

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)