tbldefs for linked tables deleted? #677
-
|
My database consists of a front-end and a couple of back-ends from which the front end links tables. I haven't done a full export since upgrading from 4.0.34 to 4.1.2, but just did one and found that all the Is this expected? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yes, this was an intended change mentioned in https://github.com/joyfullservice/msaccess-vcs-addin/releases/tag/v4.1.0 This keeps the front-end database repository a little cleaner by not trying to show changes to back-end tables. (These are more effectively tracked other ways, such as Eternal Databases in Options for SQL Server, and separate back-end repositories for Access back-end databases.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks. At some point I had wondered why the tbldefs for linked tables were included, since that seemed redundant. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Yes, this was an intended change mentioned in https://github.com/joyfullservice/msaccess-vcs-addin/releases/tag/v4.1.0
This keeps the front-end database repository a little cleaner by not trying to show changes to back-end tables. (These are more effectively tracked other ways, such as Eternal Databases in Options for SQL Server, and separate back-end repositories for Access back-end databases.)