[clang-format] Fix a bug in annotating binary operator && (llvm#138633)

Fix llvm#138485

Author: owenca

clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp

@@ -3084,10 +3084,12 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
     if (InTemplateArgument && NextToken->Tok.isAnyIdentifier())
       return TT_BinaryOperator;
 
-    // "&&" followed by "*" or "&" is quite unlikely to be two successive unary
-    // "&".
-    if (Tok.is(tok::ampamp) && NextToken->isOneOf(tok::star, tok::amp))
+    // "&&" followed by "(", "*", or "&" is quite unlikely to be two successive
+    // unary "&".
+    if (Tok.is(tok::ampamp) &&
+        NextToken->isOneOf(tok::l_paren, tok::star, tok::amp)) {
       return TT_BinaryOperator;
+    }
 
     // This catches some cases where evaluation order is used as control flow:
     //   aaa && aaa->f();

clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp

@@ -754,6 +754,13 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsNonTemplateAngleBrackets) {
   ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 27u) << Tokens;
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::less, TT_BinaryOperator);
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[20], tok::greater, TT_BinaryOperator);
+
+  Tokens = annotate("bool foo = a < b && (c * d) > e;");
+  ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 16u) << Tokens;
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::less, TT_BinaryOperator);
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[6], tok::ampamp, TT_BinaryOperator);
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[9], tok::star, TT_BinaryOperator);
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[12], tok::greater, TT_BinaryOperator);
 }
 
 TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsTemplateTemplateParameters) {