You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: documentation/src/main/asciidoc/introduction/Mapping.adoc
+3-2Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -609,11 +609,11 @@ JPA provides a `@Lob` annotation which specifies that a field should be persiste
609
609
****
610
610
What the spec actually says is that the field should be persisted
611
611
612
-
> as a large object to a database-supported large object type.
612
+
> ...as a large object to a database-supported large object type.
613
613
614
614
It's quite unclear what this means, and the spec goes on to say that
615
615
616
-
> the treatment of the `Lob` annotation is provider-dependent
616
+
> ...the treatment of the `Lob` annotation is provider-dependent...
617
617
618
618
which doesn't help much.
619
619
****
@@ -627,6 +627,7 @@ So unless you specifically need to use these JDBC LOB APIs, you _don't_ need the
627
627
628
628
Instead, as we just saw in <<column-lengths>>, all you need is to specify a large enough column `length` to accommodate the data you plan to write to that column.
0 commit comments