Skip to content

Commit ca04da2

Browse files
committed
Remove static list of PM issues.
Also add note about new features referencing the W3C process. Based on @gkellogg suggestion in #10 (comment)
1 parent 547642d commit ca04da2

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-66
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-66
lines changed

2024/json-ld-wg/index.html

Lines changed: 5 additions & 66 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -185,73 +185,12 @@ <h2>Scope</h2>
185185

186186
<section id="section-feature-updates">
187187
<h3 id="in-scope">In Scope</h3>
188-
<p>In addition to Errata and synchronization with the RDF-star Working Group, the following features tracked on the
188+
<p>In addition to Errata and synchronization with the RDF-star Working Group, features tracked on the
189189
<a href="https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/84">Project Management Page</a>
190-
are in-scope for updates to the core JSON-LD specifications:</p>
191-
192-
<ul class="scope">
193-
<li>Additional updates to properly abstract serialization/deserialization based on content type
194-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/608">w3c/json-ld-api#608</a>).</li>
195-
<li>Address concerns from Verifiable Credentials
196-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/422">w3c/json-ld-syntax#422</a>).</li>
197-
<li>Allow class-scoped framing
198-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/29">w3cjson-ld-framing#29</a>).</li>
199-
<li>Allow custom datatypes on JSON Literals
200-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/425">w3c/json-ld-syntax#425</a>).</li>
201-
<li>Change IANA Considerations to make the profile parameter required
202-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/pull/154">w3c/json-ld-framing#154</a>).</li>
203-
<li>Clarify that lexicographical order uses code point ordering
204-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/pull/417">w3c/json-ld-syntax#417</a>),
205-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/574">w3c/json-ld-api#574</a>),
206-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/pull/153">w3c/json-ld-framing#153</a>).</li>
207-
<li>Compact IRI expansion support for non-trivial prefix term definitions
208-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/191">w3c/json-ld-syntax#191</a>).</li>
209-
<li>Compacting native values
210-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/545">w3c/json-ld-api#545</a>).</li>
211-
<li>Consider context by reference with metadata
212-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/108">w3c/json-ld-syntax#108</a>).</li>
213-
<li>Consider <code>@prefix</code>
214-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/329">w3c/json-ld-syntax#329</a>).</li>
215-
<li>Consistent treatment of JSON Literals
216-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/613">w3c/json-ld-api#613</a>),
217-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/559">w3c/json-ld-api#599</a>).</li>
218-
<li><code>@default</code> in <code>@context</code>
219-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/328">w3c-json-ld-syntax#328</a>).</li>
220-
<li>Expansion does not take property-scoped contexts for nested properties into account
221-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/380">w3c/json-ld-api#380</a>).</li>
222-
<li>Fix context processing for reverse terms(issue <a href=""></a>).</li>
223-
<li>Fix context processing for reverse terms
224-
(PR <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/pull/566">w3c/json-ld-api#566</a>).</li>
225-
<li>Framing nexted graphs
226-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/150">w3c/json-ld-framing#150</a>).</li>
227-
<li>Graph-aliased keywords don't work as containers
228-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/536">w3c/json-ld-api#536</a>).</li>
229-
<li>Integer JSON value should be able to expand to IRI
230-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/509">w3c/json-ld-api#509</a>).</li>
231-
<li>Language map with global context
232-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/126">w3c/json-ld-framing#126</a>).</li>
233-
<li>Language-maps don't allow separate base direction
234-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/280">w3c/json-ld-syntax#280</a>).</li>
235-
<li>Lists, sets, and multisets
236-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/473">w3c/json-ld-api#473</a>).</li>
237-
<li>Make it easier to keep semantics of object-oriented models
238-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/376">w3c/json-ld-syntax#376</a>).</li>
239-
<li>Nested properties and compaction
240-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/391">w3c/json-ld-api#391</a>).</li>
241-
<li>Pattern Matching
242-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/118">w3c/json-ld-framing#118</a>).</li>
243-
<li>Reframing Relationships
244-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/73">w3c/json-ld-framing#73</a>).</li>
245-
<li>Several frames in the same frame document
246-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/38">w3c/json-ld-framing#38</a>).</li>
247-
<li>Specify a node type when interpreting JSON as JSON-LD
248-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/386">w3c/json-ld-syntax#386</a>).</li>
249-
<li>Support multiple IRIs for <code>@reverse</code>
250-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/372">w3c/json-ld-syntax#372</a>).</li>
251-
<li>Type Coercion / Node Conversion: <code>@coerce</code> keyword or similar
252-
(issue <a href="https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/335">w3c/json-ld-syntax#335</a>).</li>
253-
<li>Miscellaneous test improvements.</li>
254-
</ul>
190+
are in-scope for updates to the core JSON-LD specifications.</p>
191+
<p>The Working Group will also consider <a href="https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#allow-new-features">allowing new features</a> in
192+
these recommendations, according to <a href="https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#revised-rec-features">Section 6.3.11.4 of the W3C
193+
process</a>, in order to render future evolutions easier.</p>
255194
</section>
256195

257196
<section id="section-out-of-scope">

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)