Is there any different to use --storage s3 or --storage wasabi (or any other like: gs, space, and so on)? #6399
-
|
I use juicefs backed by S3 service from Wasabi. I format this using command like this: Few moment latter, I found there is a storage option specific for wasabi: --storage wasabi. Is there any difference if I'm using --storage s3 with --storage wasabi? Same question with --storage space if I want to use DigitalOcean space. Does it prefferable to use specific --storage option, or I can use common --storage s3? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
For Wasabi it’s the same — only the endpoint configuration and resolution differ. It use the S3 client for communication, and there is no difference. You might want to look at the implementation under “object” — some object storages provide their own SDK implementations. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
For Wasabi it’s the same — only the endpoint configuration and resolution differ. It use the S3 client for communication, and there is no difference.
You might want to look at the implementation under “object” — some object storages provide their own SDK implementations.