Skip to content

Fix pipename for symserver communication #120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
davidanthoff merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2020
Merged

Fix pipename for symserver communication #120

davidanthoff merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2020

Conversation

@davidanthoff
Copy link
Member

@davidanthoff davidanthoff commented Mar 13, 2020

Fixes #116. Fixes #118. Hopefully, but in any case, this is a pretty stupid bug.

@davidanthoff davidanthoff added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 13, 2020
@davidanthoff davidanthoff added this to the Current milestone Mar 13, 2020
@davidanthoff davidanthoff requested a review from ZacLN March 13, 2020 20:48
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #120 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #120   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.35%   80.35%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         626      626           
=======================================
  Hits          503      503           
  Misses        123      123
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/SymbolServer.jl 84.33% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 69ecc31...e69dd18. Read the comment docs.

@davidanthoff davidanthoff merged commit b31931d into master Mar 15, 2020
@davidanthoff davidanthoff deleted the fix-pipename branch March 15, 2020 01:53
@bellon-tiobe
Copy link

bellon-tiobe commented May 12, 2025

I arrived here chasing this error:

ERROR: LoadError: IOError: write: broken pipe (EPIPE)
Stacktrace:
  [1] uv_write(s::Base.PipeEndpoint, p::Ptr{UInt8}, n::UInt64)
    @ Base ./stream.jl:1100
  [2] unsafe_write(s::Base.PipeEndpoint, p::Ptr{UInt8}, n::UInt64)
    @ Base ./stream.jl:1154
  [3] unsafe_write
    @ ./io.jl:803 [inlined]
  [4] unsafe_write(s::Base.PipeEndpoint, p::Base.RefValue{UInt8}, n::Int64)
    @ Base ./io.jl:801
  [5] write
    @ ./io.jl:807 [inlined]
  [6] write(s::Base.PipeEndpoint, b::UInt8)
    @ Base ./stream.jl:1192
  [7] write
    @ ./io.jl:869 [inlined]
  [8] print
    @ ./char.jl:252 [inlined]
  [9] println(io::Base.PipeEndpoint)
    @ Base ./coreio.jl:5
 [10] println()
    @ Base ./coreio.jl:4
 [11] main(args::Vector{String})
    @ Main.JuliaCheck ~/Julia/JuliaCheck/src/JuliaCheck.jl:24
 [12] top-level scope
    @ ~/Julia/JuliaCheck/src/JuliaCheck.jl:27
in expression starting at /home/juanma/Julia/JuliaCheck/src/JuliaCheck.jl:1

Could it be another instance of the same issue?

The way I get this error is by calling this in Bash:

diff -q Reference.jl <( julia src/JuliaCheck.jl InputFile.jl )

I do that in a Bash loop for a bunch of files, and it only fails:

  1. for one input file.
  2. only in the loop. If I do that same thing in isolation, no problem.

@bellon-tiobe bellon-tiobe mentioned this pull request May 12, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ZacLN ZacLN ZacLN approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Next Bugfix Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IOError: bind: operation not supported on socket (ENOTSUP) ERROR: LoadError: IOError: write: broken pipe (EPIPE)

4 participants

@davidanthoff @bellon-tiobe @ZacLN