File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 6 files changed +128
-0
lines changed Expand file tree Collapse file tree 6 files changed +128
-0
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
1
+ # Jupyter Security Bi-weekly Meeting
2
+
3
+ ## August 30, 2022
4
+
5
+ | Name | affiliation| username |
6
+ | -------------------| -----------| -----------------|
7
+ | Jason Weill | AWS | @jweill-aws |
8
+ | Matthias Bussonnier| QuanSight | @carreau |
9
+ | Rollin Thomas | NERSC | @rcthomas |
10
+ | Rick Wagner | UCSD | @rpwagner |
11
+ | Maxime Jublou | naas.ai | @Dr0p42 |
12
+ | Isabela Presedo-Floyd | Quansight Labs | @isabela-pf |
13
+
14
+ - Bootstrapping official council — Jason W
15
+ - See docs: https://github.com/jupyter/governance/blob/master/bootstrapping_decision_making.md
16
+ - We should have a list of members provided for Jupyter governance within the next month (see [ Google Sheet] ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RdqRp1CIM9t-sy8xz9f_tu6BFfmrzwCM663d2p4e99U/edit#gid=1859802494 ) )
17
+ - We also need to select one member to represent us at the Software Steering Council (SSC)
18
+ - Action item: We will nominate our SSC rep at our next meeting, on Sep 13
19
+ - 2FA follow-up (due Oct 1)
20
+ - For future, push 2FA outward toward scientific python stack, etc
21
+ - Periodic review to ensure it doesn't get disabled, new projects have it turned on
22
+ -
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
1
+ # Jupyter Security Bi-weekly Meeting
2
+
3
+ ## September 13, 2022
4
+
5
+ | Name | affiliation| username |
6
+ | -------------------| -----------| -----------------|
7
+ | Rick Wagner | UCSD | @rpwagner |
8
+ | Jason Weill | AWS | @jweill-aws |
9
+ | Matthias Bussonnier| QuanSight | @carreau |
10
+ | Rollin | NERSC | @rcthomas |
11
+
12
+ - Security questionnaire
13
+ - Establish process for how to answer a security questionnaire from a potential user (e.g., FSRA Ontario)
14
+ - Matthias to attend NumFOCUS summit next week; can discuss security questions there
15
+ - Software Steering Council (SSC) rep
16
+ - We need to name and submit an SSC rep by October 3
17
+ - Update our team-compass
18
+ - Rick W to serve for one year
19
+ - 2FA
20
+ - Should be enforced in JupyterLab by our next meeting (Sep 27)
21
+ - Jason W to bring up at JupyterLab meeting tomorrow
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
1
+ # Jupyter Security Bi-weekly Meeting
2
+
3
+ ## September 27, 2022
4
+
5
+ | Name | affiliation| username |
6
+ | -------------------| -----------| -----------------|
7
+ | Rick Wagner | UCSD | @rpwagner |
8
+ | Jason Weill | AWS | @jweill-aws |
9
+ | Rollin | NERSC | @rcthomas |
10
+
11
+ - [ Security roadmap] ( https://github.com/rpwagner/security/blob/roadmap/docs/roadmap.md )
12
+ - 2FA: Needs to be enabled in JupyterLab
13
+ - Security workshop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
1
+ # Jupyter Security Bi-weekly Meeting
2
+
3
+ ## October 11, 2022
4
+
5
+ | Name | affiliation| username |
6
+ | -------------------| -----------| -----------------|
7
+ | Rick Wagner | UCSD | @rpwagner |
8
+ | Rollin | NERSC | @rcthomas |
9
+ | Matthias Bussonnier| QuanSight | @carreau |
10
+ ||||
11
+ ||||
12
+
13
+ - Meeting w/Intigriti
14
+ - Customers
15
+ - Researchers
16
+
17
+ - How is Intigriti interfacing with Jupyter ?
18
+ - 2 months ... trial period w/EC
19
+ - Multiple programs, one from the EC.
20
+ - Would Jupyter be a good fit.
21
+ - What can be tested, will be tested will determine if we can be tested.
22
+ - Sounds like issues identified external to their researchers they fund are not covered.
23
+ - Cross communication between researchers
24
+ - Would need to be a bit organized on putting CVE publications
25
+
26
+ - Post meeting
27
+ - Rick's suggestion
28
+ - Start small with a set of limited repos that are released
29
+ - Communicates what key initial packages are
30
+ - Matthias suggests
31
+ - to scope even further to types of vulnerabilities and specific package
32
+ - further more might be too vague
33
+ -
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
1
+ # Jupyter Security Bi-weekly Meeting
2
+
3
+ ## December 6, 2022
4
+
5
+ | Name | affiliation| username |
6
+ | -------------------| -----------| -----------------|
7
+ | Jason Weill | AWS | @jweill-aws |
8
+ | Sritej Attaluri | Bloomberg | |
9
+ | Rick Wagner | UCSD | @rpwagner |
10
+ | Rollin Thomas | NERSC | @rcthomas |
11
+ | Rosio Reyes | Anaconda | @RRosio |
12
+
13
+ - Triage
14
+ - Email list status?
15
+ - https://github.com/jupyter/security/issues/50
16
+ - Appears to be a permissions issue with the ipython-security mailing list not accepting external messages (from non-group members)
17
+ - Issues
18
+ - Review request: https://github.com/jupyter/security/issues/49
19
+ - Haven't done this review before, need to discuss process
20
+ - nbclassic (jupyter-notebook subproject)
21
+ - Confirm w/developers
22
+ - Respond to reporter
23
+ - Above could be shortened by ensuring developers are looped into sec reports
24
+ - Can we document guidelines about when we do backports/sec updates for existing releases vs telling people to wait for next major version
25
+ - Funding & Involvement
26
+ - Onboarding newcomers interested in helping with security
27
+ - What steps are there?
28
+ - Maybe fleshing out the README with onboarding details would be a good idea
29
+
30
+ - Integriti
31
+ - PEARC23 CfP?
32
+ - Thought:
33
+ - Subprojects should have a designated security contact
34
+ - Designated security contact is subscribed to appropriate mailing lists, etc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ What this meeting is about:
17
17
18
18
## Meeting Minutes
19
19
20
+ * [ 2022-12-06] ( 2022-12-06.md )
21
+ * [ 2022-10-11] ( 2022-10-11.md )
22
+ * [ 2022-09-27] ( 2022-09-27.md )
23
+ * [ 2022-09-13] ( 2022-09-13.md )
24
+ * [ 2022-08-30] ( 2022-08-30.md )
20
25
* [ 2022-08-16] ( 2022-08-16.md )
21
26
* [ 2022-08-02] ( 2022-08-02.md )
22
27
* [ 2022-07-05] ( 2022-07-05.md )
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments