Skip to content

Create AWS Architecture Diagramming Tools Guide #7

@jwalsh

Description

@jwalsh

Overview

Create a comprehensive guide for the team to effectively diagram AWS architectures for design reviews, documentation, and validation of system correctness.

Objectives

  • Standardize how we create AWS architecture diagrams
  • Enable version-controlled, reviewable diagrams
  • Support both quick sketches and formal documentation
  • Ensure architectural decisions are clearly communicated

Tool Coverage Requirements

Must Include

  • Mermaid - For quick, inline diagrams in markdown/org-mode
  • PlantUML - For detailed AWS-specific diagrams
  • Python Diagrams - For programmatic diagram generation
  • draw.io/diagrams.net - For visual editing when needed

Should Include

  • Structurizr - For C4 model architecture views
  • Lucidchart - If we have licenses
  • AWS Architecture Icons - Official icon usage guidelines

Content Requirements

For Each Tool

  • Installation/setup instructions
  • Pros/cons comparison
  • When to use (decision matrix)
  • Basic syntax/usage examples
  • AWS-specific features and icons

Diagram Types to Cover

  • System architecture overviews
  • Data flow diagrams
  • Sequence diagrams for workflows
  • Network topology diagrams
  • Security/VPC diagrams
  • CI/CD pipeline visualizations

AWS Services Examples

  • Serverless architectures (Lambda, API Gateway)
  • Container architectures (ECS, EKS)
  • Data pipelines (Kinesis, Glue, EMR)
  • Storage patterns (S3, EBS, EFS)
  • Database architectures (RDS, DynamoDB, OpenSearch)
  • ML pipelines (SageMaker, Bedrock)

Integration Requirements

Version Control

  • Git-friendly formats (text-based preferred)
  • Diff-able diagram sources
  • CI/CD integration for rendering

Documentation

  • Org-mode integration examples
  • Markdown compatibility
  • Export formats (PNG, SVG, PDF)

Collaboration

  • Code review best practices
  • Naming conventions
  • Folder structure recommendations

Best Practices Section

Must Include

  • Layering strategies (presentation, logic, data)
  • Consistent iconography
  • Error handling visualization
  • Security boundaries
  • Cost optimization callouts

Should Include

  • Accessibility considerations
  • Color coding standards
  • Annotation guidelines
  • Versioning strategies

Deliverables

Primary

  • Comprehensive guide document (org-mode format)
  • Quick reference/cheat sheet
  • Example diagram library
  • Tool comparison matrix

Secondary

  • Team presentation/workshop materials
  • Diagram templates
  • Validation checklist

Success Criteria

  • Team can create consistent AWS diagrams
  • Diagrams are reviewable in PRs
  • New team members can quickly learn our standards
  • Architecture reviews are more efficient
  • Diagrams stay up-to-date with code

Non-Goals

  • Teaching AWS architecture (assume AWS knowledge)
  • Covering every possible diagramming tool
  • Creating a rigid, inflexible standard
  • Replacing AWS Well-Architected reviews

Timeline

  • Week 1-2: Tool evaluation and guide outline
  • Week 3-4: Create examples and templates
  • Week 5: Team review and feedback
  • Week 6: Finalize and publish

Questions to Address

  • Do we need licenses for any tools?
  • Should we mandate specific tools for specific diagram types?
  • How do we handle diagram updates as architecture evolves?
  • Integration with existing documentation workflow?
  • Need for automated diagram generation from code/terraform?

Acceptance Criteria

  • Guide covers at least 4 different diagramming tools
  • Includes 10+ real-world AWS architecture examples
  • Team survey shows 80%+ find it useful
  • Reduces architecture review cycle time
  • Diagrams can be generated/updated via CI/CD

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    architectureSystem or solution architectureawsRelated to AWS services or infrastructuredocumentationImprovements or additions to documentationvisualizationData or architecture visualization

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions