Replies: 2 comments
-
|
That's overall a good idea. We could register the DNS names, but we wouldn't be able to "promise" connectivity when those names are used. Does this first step make sense to you ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
yep, makes sense. connectivity would obviously be the responsibility of an administrator. cool, just wanted to make sure no one has done anything like that before to avoid work duplication. thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is a duplicate of a question I asked in the NPWG slack. I'm wondering if anyone has done (or thought about) CoreDNS integration with whereabouts (through an external plugin). The idea is to provide a stable hostname for each interface assigned by whereabouts and make CoreDNS resolve those hostnames. The main goal is to simplify interaction with multus+whereabouts interfaces from both inside and outside of a k8s clusters.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions