Skip to content

Pair names don't match when WorkElement is used. #29

@eirrgang

Description

@eirrgang

This is probably just an oversight, but the name parameter from the PluginConfig does not seem to be getting used for the restraint name in the restraint potential.

Evidence: log lines like the following.

INFO     gmxapi.simulation.context:context.py:1074 Building sequence ['tpr_input', '[2721, 2994, 3237]', '[1287, 975, 3059]', '[422, 1351, 1797, 2955]', 'md_sim']

We should take a look at how this information is propagating and consider updating.

In addition to logs, this identifier could appear in terminal output or in data files.

Question: is anyone out there relying on the site sequence form of pair identifier in any scripts?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    good first issueGood for newcomersquestionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions