You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
btrfs: fix race between logging inode and checking if it was logged before
There's a race between checking if an inode was logged before and logging
an inode that can cause us to mark an inode as not logged just after it
was logged by a concurrent task:
1) We have inode X which was not logged before neither in the current
transaction not in past transaction since the inode was loaded into
memory, so it's ->logged_trans value is 0;
2) We are at transaction N;
3) Task A calls inode_logged() against inode X, sees that ->logged_trans
is 0 and there is a log tree and so it proceeds to search in the log
tree for an inode item for inode X. It doesn't see any, but before
it sets ->logged_trans to N - 1...
3) Task B calls btrfs_log_inode() against inode X, logs the inode and
sets ->logged_trans to N;
4) Task A now sets ->logged_trans to N - 1;
5) At this point anyone calling inode_logged() gets 0 (inode not logged)
since ->logged_trans is greater than 0 and less than N, but our inode
was really logged. As a consequence operations like rename, unlink and
link that happen afterwards in the current transaction end up not
updating the log when they should.
Fix this by ensuring inode_logged() only updates ->logged_trans in case
the inode item is not found in the log tree if after tacking the inode's
lock (spinlock struct btrfs_inode::lock) the ->logged_trans value is still
zero, since the inode lock is what protects setting ->logged_trans at
btrfs_log_inode().
Fixes: 0f8ce49 ("btrfs: avoid inode logging during rename and link when possible")
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
0 commit comments