C#/.NET implementation for 2.0

[Astrusia]

Hi,
I just found this

Is that sufficient to be added to the table in the readme? Since Kadlet is not supporting 2.0 currently. (and considering the last commit there, it likely never will)

I did not want to make this an issue, as I am not sure about your standards

[oledfish]

Hello, as the developer I would like to apologize for failing to keep the library updated. I made it at a time in my life when I was very interested in the .NET ecosystem, but over time I lost that interest. I should not have contributed when I wasn't certain I'd be able to keep the library updated.

If the maintainers feel it's suitable to remove it from the list I fully understand and it might be for the best.

[Astrusia]

No need to apologize imo, you provided a good library, and losing interest is natural.
The suggested one seems to have a capable dev behind it.

Sorry if I sounded condescending or whatever the fitting word is.
Thanks for the time and contribution 👍

[tabatkins]

We can annotate Kadlet as being 1.0 only, and add KdlSharp as well. Mind PRing?

[Astrusia]

I am new to this so sorry for any misunderstanding:
Do you mean i should make a PR for the readme? I have no idea of the codebase, i was just researching and learning, so I am not sure if there is more to it than the readme. (a PR for a single line in the readme just feels a bit silly, which is why I am having doubts)

[tabatkins]

In the README, and on the website at https://github.com/kdl-org/kdl-org.github.io

[Astrusia]

Ok, I hope what I did is fine. See: #551 and website PR