Skip to content

Conversation

SamuelMarks
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 84.44444% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.99%. Comparing base (7da416d) to head (dff423a).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
keras/src/applications/efficientnet_v2.py 70.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/applications/convnext.py 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/applications/inception_v3.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/datasets/cifar100.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/utils/file_utils.py 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/utils/progbar.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/applications/mobilenet_v3.py 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/backend/openvino/numpy.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/callbacks/model_checkpoint.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
keras/src/datasets/cifar10.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #21343      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.94%   84.99%   +8.04%     
==========================================
  Files         568      568              
  Lines       56895    56905      +10     
  Branches     8889     8890       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        43780    48365    +4585     
+ Misses      10862     6230    -4632     
- Partials     2253     2310      +57     
Flag Coverage Δ
keras 84.80% <84.44%> (+8.01%) ⬆️
keras-jax 65.96% <82.96%> (+2.30%) ⬆️
keras-numpy 58.39% <39.25%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
keras-openvino 34.68% <18.51%> (+0.13%) ⬆️
keras-tensorflow 66.52% <83.70%> (?)
keras-torch 66.09% <82.22%> (+2.28%) ⬆️
keras.applications 83.60% <88.88%> (?)
keras.applications-jax 83.60% <88.88%> (?)
keras.applications-numpy 22.81% <5.55%> (?)
keras.applications-openvino 22.81% <5.55%> (?)
keras.applications-tensorflow 83.60% <88.88%> (?)
keras.applications-torch 83.33% <88.88%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gbaned gbaned added this to PR Queue Jun 5, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Assigned Reviewer in PR Queue Jun 5, 2025
@gbaned gbaned requested a review from fchollet June 5, 2025 05:02
@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamuelMarks

Thank you for this PR!

Can you rebase it? It looks like some files need merging (and sorry for taking so long to look at it).

@SamuelMarks
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hertschuh updated

@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

The code needs to be reformatted it looks like, please see this section: https://github.com/keras-team/keras/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#generating-public-api-and-formatting-the-code

@SamuelMarks
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hertschuh Done

@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertschuh Done

Still failing, it's actually the api_gen hook.

Can you try pre-commit run --all-files and then git diff to see what's going on?

@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot added kokoro:force-run ready to pull Ready to be merged into the codebase labels Aug 21, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Assigned Reviewer to Approved by Reviewer in PR Queue Aug 21, 2025
@hertschuh hertschuh merged commit bf85450 into keras-team:master Aug 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Approved by Reviewer to Merged in PR Queue Aug 21, 2025
@google-ml-butler google-ml-butler bot removed the ready to pull Ready to be merged into the codebase label Aug 21, 2025
@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot @SamuelMarks !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants