|
| 1 | +# Architectural Design Records (ADRs) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This directory contains Architectural Design Records (ADRs) that document important technical decisions made throughout the project's development. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Purpose |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +ADRs capture the context, decision, and consequences of significant architectural choices. They help: |
| 8 | +- Preserve decision-making rationale for future reference |
| 9 | +- Onboard new team members by explaining why certain approaches were chosen |
| 10 | +- Avoid revisiting settled decisions without proper context |
| 11 | +- Maintain consistency across the codebase |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## Naming Convention |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +- Start with `DR` followed by a three-digit incremented number and an underscore |
| 16 | +- Use descriptive names that clearly indicate the decision being documented |
| 17 | +- Format: `DR###_DESCRIPTIVE_NAME.md` |
| 18 | +- Example: `DR032_Database_Migration_Strategy.md` |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Structure |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Each ADR should follow this general structure: |
| 23 | +1. **Title**: Clear, concise description of the decision |
| 24 | +2. **Date**: When the decision was made (YYYY-MM-DD format) |
| 25 | +3. **Status**: Proposed, Accepted, Rejected, Deprecated, or Superseded |
| 26 | +4. **Context**: Background information and problem being solved |
| 27 | +5. **Decision**: The chosen solution and reasoning |
| 28 | +6. **Consequences**: Expected outcomes, trade-offs, and implications |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +## Current Records |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +- DR001: Deployment guide and infrastructure decisions |
| 33 | +- DR002: RSVP approval and calendar integration feature |
| 34 | +- DR003: Email queue system architecture |
| 35 | +- DR004: Default profile picture implementation |
| 36 | +- DR005: Client testing methodology |
| 37 | +- DR006: General testing guidelines |
| 38 | +- DR007: Clerk profile integration approach |
0 commit comments