Revert "riscv: misaligned: fix sleeping function called during misaligned access handling"

This reverts commit 61a74ad ("riscv: misaligned: fix sleeping function
called during misaligned access handling"). The commit addresses a sleeping
in atomic context problem, but it is not the correct fix as explained by
Clément:

"Using nofault would lead to failure to read from user memory that is paged
out for instance. This is not really acceptable, we should handle user
misaligned access even at an address that would generate a page fault."

This bug has been properly fixed by commit 453805f ("riscv:
misaligned: enable IRQs while handling misaligned accesses").

Revert this improper fix.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Clément Léger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Fixes: 61a74ad ("riscv: misaligned: fix sleeping function called during misaligned access handling")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>

Author: covanam

arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c

@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static int handle_scalar_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	val.data_u64 = 0;
 	if (user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (copy_from_user_nofault(&val, (u8 __user *)addr, len))
+		if (copy_from_user(&val, (u8 __user *)addr, len))
 			return -1;
 	} else {
 		memcpy(&val, (u8 *)addr, len);
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int handle_scalar_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	if (user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (copy_to_user_nofault((u8 __user *)addr, &val, len))
+		if (copy_to_user((u8 __user *)addr, &val, len))
 			return -1;
 	} else {
 		memcpy((u8 *)addr, &val, len);