@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ nvmet_fc_disconnect_assoc_done(struct nvmefc_ls_req *lsreq, int status)
459459 * down, and the related FC-NVME Association ID and Connection IDs
460460 * become invalid.
461461 *
462- * The behavior of the fc-nvme target is such that it's
462+ * The behavior of the fc-nvme target is such that its
463463 * understanding of the association and connections will implicitly
464464 * be torn down. The action is implicit as it may be due to a loss of
465465 * connectivity with the fc-nvme host, so the target may never get a
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ nvmet_fc_transfer_fcp_data(struct nvmet_fc_tgtport *tgtport,
23132313 ret = tgtport -> ops -> fcp_op (& tgtport -> fc_target_port , fod -> fcpreq );
23142314 if (ret ) {
23152315 /*
2316- * should be ok to set w/o lock as its in the thread of
2316+ * should be ok to set w/o lock as it's in the thread of
23172317 * execution (not an async timer routine) and doesn't
23182318 * contend with any clearing action
23192319 */
@@ -2629,7 +2629,7 @@ nvmet_fc_handle_fcp_rqst(struct nvmet_fc_tgtport *tgtport,
26292629 * and the api of the FC LLDD which may issue a hw command to send the
26302630 * response, but the LLDD may not get the hw completion for that command
26312631 * and upcall the nvmet_fc layer before a new command may be
2632- * asynchronously received - its possible for a command to be received
2632+ * asynchronously received - it's possible for a command to be received
26332633 * before the LLDD and nvmet_fc have recycled the job structure. It gives
26342634 * the appearance of more commands received than fits in the sq.
26352635 * To alleviate this scenario, a temporary queue is maintained in the
0 commit comments